Roger Helmer MEP


Ken Clarke on the EU Constitution
June 16, 2009, 9:14 am
Filed under: Uncategorized

It is reported that Ken Clarke has appeared in the media, to say that if the Conservatives form a government after the EU Constitution (aka The Lisbon Treaty) is fully ratified, then they will certainly not want to re-open the Treaty.  They will allow it to stand.
 
Compare that with our declared policy that in these circumstances “We will not accept its legitimacy and we will not allow it to stand”, and “We will not let matters rest there”.
 
During the recent euro-election campaign, this was our firm and declared policy, and both our Shadow Foreign Secretary William Hague, and our Shadow Europe Minister Mark Francois, were happy to abbreviate that pledge for sound-bite purposes to “Vote Conservative for a referendum”.  This is the basis and the commitment on which I and the other Conservative MEPs were re-elected.
 
It would be charitable to assume that Ken was merely expressing a personal view, rather than seeking unilaterally to re-write Conservative policy.  But even so, he has dismayed most of the party, and offered comfort to those in other parties, especially UKIP, who derided our commitment on the referendum as too vague to count for much.
 
I personally regard our commitment not to accept the Lisbon Treaty as the heart of the Manifesto on which I was elected two weeks ago, and I should regard any retreat from it as a betrayal of our supporters, and of the British people.  This is not the way to restore trust in politics.  I am confident that the Party will indeed do what it says it will do — if I were not, I should not have stood as a Conservative.  If however I am wrong, and at some future stage it becomes clear that it would not, that the Conservative Party intended to resile from the referendum promise, then I for one should have to consider my position very carefully.  Then again, perhaps Ken should consider carefully, too.


5 Comments so far
Leave a comment

Well Roger, your faith in Tory high command is touching, but you must have seen Hague dismal performance on Newsnight where Paxman tried to get him to say something concrete. Hague failed to say anything, but took a long time about it. Ken, as is his wont went straight to the point.
Oddly enough, whilst we all know the rather contentless quote about not letting matters rest, I googled the former, more substantive quote just now,
http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&q=%E2%80%9CWe+will+not+accept+its+legitimacy+and+we+will+not+allow+it+to+stand%E2%80%9D%2C+&meta=

It exists in two forms. Here in this blog post, and a letter you wrote to the Nottingham paper. When did Hague say it, and what do you believe the Tory leadership think it means in practical terms?

Comment by Gawain Towler

It’s not simply the intervention of K Clarke that irks me (has he become shadow Europe minister, then?) but the fact that his outburst has conveniently been left until after the EU elections.

I suspect that the UKIP vote would have been higher, had he showed the Tories’ hand in advance.

Comment by Ken Stevens

I too will have to reconsider my planned vote in the GE should the Conservatives back out of their pledge on a referendum. Labour had lost my vote before all the nonsense hit the fan due to their lies and evasions on this very issue. UKIP anyone?

Comment by Political Noob

Roger – Exactly when will the penny, or in this case Euro, drop?

Comment by Ken

But of course he didn’t “show the Tories’ hand in advance”. Ken speaks for himself, not for me and 95% of the Party.

Comment by Roger Helmer




Leave a comment
Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <pre> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>