Speaking on the Common Agricultural Policy

Chairman, Minister,

I have been asked to stand in for my colleague Mr. Agnew. You may be relieved to note his absence, but I shall do my best to fill the gap.

You have only six months, Mr. Coveney, to improve this dog’s breakfast of a CAP reform proposal.

Where is the simplification? Promised, given as an objective, but now lost without trace.

Where is the reduction in red tape? We have complex rules surrounding Ecological Focus Areas, and differentiating land managers from farmers, and allowing double-funding from taxpayers’ money. How does this make life simpler, or more transparent?

This is not really a reform at all. It is more of the same — but worse. And most disgraceful of all is M. Dantin’s crude, protectionist anti-market stitch-up, epitomised by his plans for sugar.

Mr. Coveney, Chairman: UK and European consumers are paying nearly double the price they might for their sugar. Jobs in the UK, and at other cane refineries in the EU, will be lost.

Mr. Agnew specifically asked me to raise — as he has done many times — the issue of the British company Tate & Lyle.

Mr. Agnew says that crucial questions he tabled on sugar reform on November 28th last year remain unanswered. Will you please ensure that these issues are addressed promptly?

The proposals before us today do nothing to solve these problems.

At a time when food prices are rising, these proposals represent protectionist mis-management of the market, inflicted on the EU, and the UK, for a further decade.

I call on you, Mr. Coveney, to use your Presidency to bring some common sense to the reform:

To ensure that, at a time of rising prices and forecasts of food shortages, farmers are not held back by unjustified and perverse “greening” incentives;

And ensure that hard-working people in my country, and the seven other member-states with cane refineries, do not lose their jobs to old-fashioned protectionism.

I look forward to your response.

About these ads
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Speaking on the Common Agricultural Policy

  1. We won’t feed 7 billion people if the most productive arable land in the world in N Europe is pushed into artificial “greening”. Nor will it benefit some of Europes most successful manufacturers like Syngenta, BASF, Bayer etc….
    Let farmers farm!

  2. mikestallard says:

    You and Dan Hannan – and now Mr Gillingham in the Telegraph – seem to be the only people reporting on the EU at all.
    If we – yes we – are to win the coming referendum, it is essential that the EU gets reported regularly. why was the dreadful speech of Mr Verhofstadt reported the other day? Why isn’t this CAP thing reported at all?
    The more the British People get to see of this disgraceful Institution the better.
    I keep thinking of German Unification – universally presented as a Good Thing. In theory, yes, brilliant – under Bismarck. But of course, it had a “democratic deficit” after the death of Frederick III and that led to dreadful things. Dreadful things.

  3. mikestallard says:

    I have just listened to the reply. the Chairman considered himself to be an expert on sugar. Then he said he didn’t know the details on Tate and Lyle.
    So how can he micromanage it?

    • rfhmep says:

      Did you notice that he also said he thought that the CAP was the EU’s only successful policy? He’s wrong in so far as the CAP is not successful; right in so far as there are no other successful policies!

  4. Linda Hudson says:

    All power to your elbow!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s