Wearing the tie for the Second Amendment

"Wearing the tie for the Second Amendment" -- Roger sports the NRA tie in the Strasbourg Hemicycle.

"Wearing the tie for the Second Amendment" -- Roger sports the NRA tie in the Strasbourg Hemicycle

Some time ago I was working in Brussels with Dan Mitchell, formerly of the Heritage Foundation, now with the Cato Institute (both excellent conservative Washington think-tanks), and I noticed he was wearing a really great tie — all stars and stripes and antique type-setting.  On closer examination, it turned out to be the tie of the US National Rifle Association — that bastion of conservative values in the US of A.  And emblazoned on it was the famous Second Amendment to the US Constitution:

“A well-regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed”.

As my good friend Dan Hannan likes to say, the US Constitution is chiefly about the rights of the people, whereas the EU Constitution is chiefly about the power of the state.  Mind you I suppose we could have a debate about whether America’s millions of gun owners represent “a well-regulated militia”, in any sense which the authors of the amendment might recognise.

I admired Dan (Mitchell)’s tie, and with typical American generosity he immediately took it off and insisted on giving it to me, saying he could easily enough get another back in the US.  He was across again in Brux last week, and I mentioned how much I was enjoying wearing the tie.  He asked for a photograph of it in the European parliament, so here it is, taken in the Strasbourg Hemicycle.

There are those in Britain who will look rather sniffily at the US, and blame America’s high level of gun crime on the Second Amendment.  But we should be careful about reaching simplistic conclusions.  After the Dunblane tragedy in the UK, we introduced some of the most draconian gun laws in the world, so that even our Olympic shooting teams find it difficult to train in the UK.  Has our gun crime gone down?  It has not.  I understand that guns are cheaper and more widely available in the UK now, than they were before Dunblane.

As the old bumper-sticker put it, “If guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns”.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Wearing the tie for the Second Amendment

  1. John Wilkin says:

    Switzerland has one of the highest levels of gun ownership in the world, I think about one Swiss in three has one. It also has one of the lowest levels of gun crime.

  2. Wilko says:

    The state is not the servant of the people when every adult male has a vote but when every man has a rifle.

  3. Joseph Lynch says:

    “There are those in Britain who will look rather sniffily at the US, and blame America’s high level of gun crime on the Second Amendment.”

    To those who quote this argument, you should point them to this brilliant study “More Guns, Less Crime” by John R Lott. The statistical analysis is exhaustive and contains everything you would ever want to know about the effect of gun ownership on crime rates.

    It seems to be that if you imposed a blanket ban on guns, the law abiding people who would hand them in would then be at the mercy of the criminals who wouldn’t hand in and then have no means of defending themselves.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s