The EPP: Cameron delivers

Yesterday (March 11th) at a meeting of the UK Conservative delegation in Straz, William Hague and Mark Francois, fresh from a meeting with EPP Group President Joseph Daul, announced that they had given formal notice to the EPP that Conservative MEPs would leave the EPP group at the end of this parliamentary term, in three months’ time.  This should not be news at all, since David Cameron and William have repeatedly confirmed the intention, but none-the-less it was good to hear that the formal process was in place.
 
Labour have a Leader who (inter alia) promised an end to boom’n’bust, and a referendum on the European Constitution.  He did not deliver.  We have a leader who promised to take us out of the EPP, and despite delays, he is now delivering.  I voted for Cameron in our Conservative leadership election mainly because of his commitment on the EPP, and I am delighted to see it fulfilled.
 
I had just tumbled off an overnight flight from New York via London, and hadn’t even had time to change, so I attended the meeting dishevelled, tie-less and unshaven, but I relished the occasion none-the-less.
 
This news on the EPP is surely of no interest — meaningless indeed — to the great majority of voters, who know nothing of the EPP and care even less.  Yet to political anoraks and activists, and to Brussels insiders, it is momentous news.  It is a touchstone issue. As I have been asked a hundred times: how can you pretend to be a eurosceptic Party when you sit with the Group that calls itself “the motor of European integration”?  This is a story that has run for at least ten years — the whole of my parliamentary career.  When I was first elected in 1999, the Party announced a new, arm’s length relationship with the EPP (“merely sharing an administrative umbrella”), and I thought in my naïveté that we had won the battle.
 
So you can imagine my rage and disappointment at our first delegation meeting in July 1999 when our then Leader Edward McMillan Scott announced (as near as I can remember): “Well that’s all sorted out then — back to business as usual”.  That precipitated a row that ran on and off for years until Cameron lanced the boil.
 
Of course people are now asking “So who’s in your new group, then?”.  The answer is that these are sensitive political issues for all the parties involved, and our new partners will want to time their own announcements to suit their own domestic political agendas.  It would be quite improper for us to jump the gun.  So watch this space.  We will be forming a new, centre-right, non-federalist Party in the new parliament, and I look forward very much to joining it.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to The EPP: Cameron delivers

  1. Malcolm Edward says:

    Great news. That’s a significant step in the right direction – though I’d much prefer to be out of the EU altogether.

  2. Christian Barber says:

    Roger – what do you think about the accusation that this will greatly decrease our influence on legislation – no more committee chairs etc? Also I have heard rumours that some of our MEPs won’t accept it? Not sure if there is anything they can do to stop it or join the EPP as individual MEPs?

  3. Roger Helmer says:

    Christian, The “influence” point has been peddled by the integrationists for years. It’s nonsense. We will get posts and reports pro-rata to our numbers, as we do now, but without the malign influence of the EPP (which for example ensured that Dan Hannan never got speaking time on Constitutional Affairs, despite being on the committee). My experience as a non-inscrit is that I have more information funding, more speaking time, more staff support and more access to facilities. Same will apply in a new group. In this area as in others, we are Better Off Out!

  4. David York says:

    Hello Roger. Why is the Tory party not more openly in favour of controlled return of powers to Westminster? So many people I speak to are sick to death of the controlling, interfering nature of the EC, let alone the incompetence and corruption. UK governance is is our worst enemy because of our culture. As a nation we play by the rules and government and regulators gold plate unquestioningly the demands of directives. In your newsletter you ask that voters in the euros should vote Tory and not UKIP. People only vote UKIP because they do not see the Tory leadership clearly stating what voters want to hear. I can see both points of view, but it is asking a lot of people to ‘trust’ that the Tory party will do the right thing. Frankly I am not convinced by Dave and I don’t trust him. Now if you were PM. . . . Regards David York

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s