On April 29th I attended an event organised jointly by the Parkinson’s Disease Society, the Alzheimer’s Association, the British Heart Foundation and others, under the aegis of the UK Biosciences Federation. The event coincided with the parliament’s consideration of a new regulation on animal testing for medical purposes, and of course we MEPs have been besieged by organised letter and e-mail campaigns calling for a unilateral end to all animal experiments.
Several key points emerged at the event I attended, and they are worth keeping in mind.
Firstly, virtually all major advances in health care in the last century have depended on animal research. Don’t take my word for it — that’s a quote from the Department of Health. I have a list in front of me of breakthroughs that have been based on animal experiments, and it’s far to long to reproduce here, but it includes the malaria lifecycle, smallpox vaccine, corneal transplants (I’ve had two), blood transfusions, kidney dialysis, polio vaccine, cardiac pacemakers, heart transplants, hepatitis C vaccines, bird flu vaccine, stem cell and gene therapy. Human health care has benefitted hugely from animal experiments.
Secondly, the benefits are not just for humans but for animals too. It’s estimated that between 15 and 20% of all animal research is about curing animal diseases, and creating veterinary medicines. Animal experiments have been vital not only for human healthcare, but for animal welfare as well.
Thirdly, the effect of a total EU ban would simply be to move essential research elsewhere. This would damage science and research in EU countries — it might well cause pharmaceutical companies to move other operations offshore as well, costing jobs and investment. But it would also move animal testing to jurisdictions with lower welfare standards than those already existing in the EU. This is the critical point: a total ban on animal experiments in the EU would result in more animal suffering, not less. And quite possibly it would result in poorer science as well.
Of course just about everyone agrees that animal testing should be minimised. The European parliament has done a great deal of work to promote and encourage non-animal testing methods. There has been great progress on non-animal testing methods. And everyone agrees that the testing we do should be done as humanely as possible. The controls and restrictions and certification régimes already in place on animal testing are extremely rigorous. But as of today, there is an irreducible minimum of animal testing which must continue, both for research on Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s, and for a range of other diseases and techniques. And that research is vital for both human health and animal welfare.
Search the blog
Calendar of posts
- My final speech in Strasbourg – Two-seat parliament a perfect metaphor for the hubris and futility of EU project
- The European parliament: an apology
- COP21 climate agreement: An eye-watering amount of money for virtually no return
- £100,000 mis-spent?
- EU energy labelling: confusing consumers and creating problems for industry
Jane Davies on The European parliament: an… catweazle666 on The European parliament: an… Sheila White on The European parliament: an… charles wardrop on The European parliament: an… Mike Maunder on The European parliament: an…
- An Open Letter to Professor Michael Merrifield of Nottingham University
- Sorry, Tony Blair. But you’re wrong. Again.
- Little Englander, little European?
- Is David Cameron making a fool of himself?
- Speaking at the Employment Committee - 26 January 2012
- Why is Nissan so pro-EU?
- The 12th International Conference on Climate Change
- The predictive power of a 1934 cartoon!
- The physics of a boiling kettle - my question to the commission!
- The thoughts of George Osborne
- 943,593 hits
- Add new tag
- Air fares
- Alan Johnson
- Al Gore
- Animal Welfare
- Broughton Astley
- Climate Change
- Credit Crunch
- David Cameron
- David Davis
- emissions trading
- Energy Security
- EU Presidency
- Freedom Zone
- Free Speech
- Global Warming
- GM Food
- gordon brown
- Lib Dems
- Liberal Democrats
- Monetary Union
- No Campaign
- Peer reviewed papers
- Philip Lardner
- Politics Show
- roger helmer
- Sarah Palin
- Stem Cell Research
- St George's Day
- The Freedom Zone
- Vice President
- windfall tax