Extradition and the European Arrest Warrant

There have been two prominent stories in Derby recently, both of which relate to sending suspects or criminals from one country to another.

There are the “Derby Two”, David Birkinshaw and Matthew Neale, accused in Riga, Latvia, on very tenuous evidence, of assaulting an auxiliary policeman, and sent off to Riga under the terms of the European Arrest Warrant (EAW).  They were held in appalling conditions for an indefinite period, and denied the rights which we take for granted in Britain.  Acquitted last year, they now have to go back to Riga for a second time, because the prosecutor has decided to appeal against the acquittal.  The next hearing is in Riga on May 27th, and I may well be there to support them.

Then we have Mr. Richard Guelbert, a convicted rapist on the Sex Offenders’ Register, who has broken the terms of his conditional release, and fled to Switzerland.  The Derby Constabulary want him back, but since Switzerland has no Sex Offenders’ Register, they do not recognise failure to sign on to it as a criminal offence, and therefore they are not prepared to extradite him.  Of course the EAW does not apply here, since Switzerland has wisely decided not to join the EU.

I have said that I should like to see Mr. Guelbert returned to Derby, and I have written to the Swiss Ambassador to ask if he can see any way to achieve this.

However I have attracted criticism for what is seen as an inconsistency: in the case of the Derby Two, I opposed their being sent to Riga under the terms of the EAW; while in the case of Mr. Guelbert, I have called for him to be extradited.

I could reply that there is a clear difference between, on the one hand, sending two suspects to a foreign country, and on the other hand, bringing a convicted rapist back to his own country.  But it is more fundamental than that.  Conventional extradition is quite a different thing from the EAW.  With extradition, there is a range of safeguards for the citizen.  In particular, a UK court has to agree that there is a material case to answer before allowing extradition, and may form a view about the reliability of the judicial system in the other country.

But with the EAW, the safeguards are set aside, and grave injustices can follow, as we see in the cases of David Birkinshaw and Matthew Neale.  Not just they, but any one of us, on the whim of a foreign magistrate, can be dragged off to jail in Latvia, or Bulgaria, or (in future, perhaps) Croatia or Turkey, and we have no protection at all.

So I make no apology and recognise no inconsistency.  I support extradition, with proper safeguards for the citizen, and I should like to use it to try to find a way to return Mr. Guelbert from Switzerland to UK custody before he re-offends.  But I remain adamantly opposed to the EAW, which is a grave threat to our historic British liberties.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Extradition and the European Arrest Warrant

  1. “In particular, a UK court has to agree that there is a material case to answer before allowing extradition, and may form a view about the reliability of the judicial system in the other country”

    Yes, yes, thrice yes. The EAW is not a grave threat, it has already destroyed these safeguards. Next step, one EU wide judicial system, on the grounds of “Ever Closer Union” Our Common Law system, replaced by the EU’s Civil law system seems to be the goal.

    Rulers don’t like Common Law as it gives individuals rights and thus rulers seem determined to undermine it. Rulers like Civil Law as through it they can control its citizens rather than allow its citizens control of the state. In the UK we have just had our first trial without jury. As you remind us, the European Arrest Warrant allows people to be taken from the UK with no examination of the evidence, no right of appeal, just on the say so of another European court. Habeas Corpus is dead and under what authority? Just the will of the Elite.

    Please also remember Andrew Symeou, in a filthy Greek gaol since last summer, forgotten by the authorities, as a result of an EAW for which there is no supporting evidence. Stay out of the EU this summer!

  2. Cliff Williams says:

    Citizens must demand a referendum on leaving the EU. Either the criminal system or the financial strain, from issues like Greece, could be more than the country is prepared to carry.
    Of course, you may want to wait until after the BP oil bill comes in – for the clean-up in the Gulf of Mexico. Germany and Brussels will not mind paying their fair share…LOL.

  3. paulsimon says:

    Guelbert, a Swiss citizen, convicted entirely on the uncorroborated evidence of one alleged victim, served his sentence, you want him back? The Darby two, for which there is evidence, no matter how fragile, you don’t want them prosecuted? sounds odd to me!

    • Lionel says:

      you make a fair point,
      did the woman say no at anytime to his advances?
      if not then it isnt rape unless she was intoxicated.

      is Mr Guelbert appealing his conviction.

  4. The EU is still taking steps to increase the range of methods, by which it is able to use law enforcement as a mechanism of control and discouraging any form of dissent or direct action. Of course, there are perfectly legitimate reasons why criminals should be located and detained. However, the EU has more sinister intentions for the long-term – which it is gradually implementing by stealth. As Roger Helmer has explained (see above), seemingly innocuous changes to current extradition protocol can be applied to the detriment of our civil liberties. The case of the Derby Two, could be the first of many.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s