BP: What should Tony Hayward have said?

I’ve always believed that the first rule of politics is: if you don’t know the answer, say so. Much better to say, “I’m not fully briefed on that, but if you want I can get back to you on it later”, rather than trying to flannel. I remember that one of the East Midlands euro-candidates in the 1998 selection, asked a question about the Common Fisheries Policy, proceeded to dig a deep hole and fall into it. She came last.

What’s good for politics may also be good for business. So I think Tony Hayward was right, at his Congressional hearing, to say, in effect, “I don’t know”. As a Chief Executive, he shouldn’t be expected to know all the technical details in a highly technical business. And as the top man of BP, he shouldn’t venture personal speculation about the causes of the disaster, or the potential liability, while experts inside and outside the company are still studying the case. This is doubly so given the potential legal consequences.

So I think he did OK. Nothing he did could have rescued BP’s reputation in the US. But I think maybe he could have said a bit more in his own defence.

To start with, he should have stressed that BP is in effect a largely American company. 40% of the shares are owned in America. A big chunk of BP’s activities and earnings are in America. The offshore oil they’re recovering is largely consumed in America. Most of the executives and staff of the US operation are Americans. They didn’t change the name of the company to BP ten years ago because they were ashamed to be British. They changed it because BP had grown from a British company to a global company, with huge interests and commitments in the USA. And Obama’s insistence on using the old name and stressing the “British”, despite his protestations to the contrary, is a transparent attempt to deflect criticism by blackguarding foreigners. And of course the corporations sub-contracted to do the actual drilling on the Deepwater rig were American companies.

And he might have added: “Look guys. We’re doing everything we can to fix this problem, and we’re having serious difficulties. But we’re the only guys in the world capable of making the effort. President Obama can’t do it (someone suggested he needs a plaque on his desk reading “The Buck Stops Somewhere Else”). The US Coastguard can’t do it. The US military has admitted it can’t do it. So if you want it fixed, you’d do better to let me and my team focus on stopping the leak, rather than taking part in this cynical media scrum and fielding questions to which no one yet knows the answer. And if you want us to be around long enough to fulfil our obligations to the environment and to all those who are suffering because of the accident, you’d better go easy on the fines and the unlimited liabilities covering incidental consequences three and four times removed from the spill. If we go bust, you can wave goodbye to damages”.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to BP: What should Tony Hayward have said?

  1. Cliff Williams says:

    Roger, you know as well as I that the typical liberal mode of operation is to take credit for things that go well and divert attention when things go terribly wrong. Obama and the liberal congress are falling in popularity so fast that they must do something to deflect the attention.
    I am a Texan and American and the vast majority of the people I speak with do not blame or feel animosity toward our brothers in the UK. It was an accident. Obama is the one who turned around the international help that came to our rescue, he also slowed Louisiana’s response. The problems from the well have been magnified by Obama’s shoddy response

    My comment yesterday in a blog was that Obama and the liberal members of Congress have harmed our country to a far greater degree with their financial bailouts, climate change agenda and spending, lack of border control and taking over private industry than the well in the gulf has hurt us. When can we place these presidents and congressional members under the close scrutiny in a similar setting to what Mr. Hayward endured? The damage from the well is very small in comparison, indeed.

  2. Thanks Cliff for your generous and perceptive reply.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s