Trouble at the Telegraph

 Once upon a time, the Daily Telegraph was practically the house journal of the Conservative Party.  Today, many Conservatives have sworn never to touch it again.  The reason?  Its over-the-top coverage of the expenses scandal.  Few would disagree that to start with, at least, the paper had a point and did a public service.  But by extending the story beyond its natural life, by scraping the barrel and squeezing the lemon dry, they overdid it and started to undermine trust and confidence in our institutions.  As a media outlet, of course, they were keen to personalise the story, but their ad hominem attacks on MPs who had simply been working within the rules – and had been urged by the powers-that-be to ensure they maximised their claims – became rather nauseating.
If the system allowed MPs to charge for home and garden maintenance, then it comes as no surprise that home and garden items were charged – even manure for the rose beds.  The airing of personal details and dirty washing was way over the top.  I was particularly struck by the way one MP was vilified for charging a camera.  I use a camera constantly in the course of my work as an MEP, and I make no apology for having charged the camera to my office expenses.  It’s a legitimate tool of the job.
Now the Telegraph is at it again.  On August 25th, it announced (Shock! Horror!) that the Tories were offering “Access to Ministers” for £1000.  And it followed up next day by saying that they were offering access to the Prime Minister himself, David Cameron, for £2000.  What a wicked abuse of public office!  Shame upon them!
The paper has, of course, overlooked the fact that David Cameron is not only Prime Minister, but also the Leader of the Conservative Party, and he has duties in both rôles.  Like it or not, one of the necessary tasks of Party management is fund-raising.  And it turns out that “Access to Ministers” means no more than buying a ticket for a fund-raising dinner at Party Conference.  Few people, and certainly not I – nor the Daily Telegraph – favour state funding for political parties.  So we can hardly complain, surely, about a fund-raising dinner at a Party Conference.  That is entirely normal, perfectly well known, and so far as I can tell it is done by all parties.

And “Access to Cameron” for £2000?  That turns out to be “Team 2000”, a fund-raising project offering Party supporters the opportunity to become involved in the Party’s work and – yes – to attend the occasional meeting with key people.  Again, a very normal, indeed traditional, method of fund-raising, and entirely proper and appropriate.    So let me admonish the Telegraph in the words which Clement Attlee is supposed to have written to Harold Laski, “I can assure you there is widespread resentment in the Party at your activities, and a period of silence on your part would be welcome”.

Whether or not you are a major organ of the national press, there’s little percentage in biting the hand that feeds you.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Trouble at the Telegraph

  1. Julian says:

    I for one don’t want to read a newspaper that has a different view on what is right or wrong depending on which party is doing it. I never used to read the Telegraph because I assumed that whatever it said, it would support the Tories. As you say, it “was practically the house journal of the Conservative Party”. True blue Tories and party members might like there to be such a thing but it diminishes the stature of any national newspaper to behave that way. I assume you don’t pay much attention to the Guardian for similar reasons.

    I think also that the world has changed. It used to be possible for a national paper to preach to its tribe and they uncritically accepted whatever was said. That was because the only other sources were also tribal. Now we have the internet and any attempt by a newspaper to cover something up or present a partial or misleading view is spotted in minutes and the opposite view expressed. For an example, look again at the Guardian. Polly Toynbee can’t get away with saying anything without someone pointing out where she’s wrong.

    I have become more and more impressed with the Telegraph. I hadn’t put that down to its becoming less Tory, but you may have hit the nail on the head.

  2. Russellw says:

    What alternative is there for Conservative leaning folks? The “Mail?” Probably not. Many years ago there used to be a party originated newspaper called “Conservative News” which was distributed via Association offices & which became too costly to sustain. We now have a number of Conservative websites & blogs, so do we need a national newspaper to compete with DT? If you think so, Roger, how about starting one up?!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s