“EU Membership is in our national interest”

I have written and video’d and podcasted at some length on the Coalition’s riotously silly EU Bill.  That’s the one which promises us a referendum on EU power-grabs whenever ministers think it appropriate to do so, or which in other words promises us nothing, since Ministers can always call a referendum when they think it appropriate, without any help from an EU Bill.
 
I have watched Europe Minister David Lidington apparently squirming with embarrassment in his YouTube video as he seeks to defend the indefensible, and I have felt my own toes curling with embarrassment as I watched.  Clearly as a Conservative MEP I cannot possibly seek to defend the Bill, which is why I am obliged to repudiate it immediately, rather than waiting to be challenged on it by our critics.  I have now also received a letter from David Lidington, which also seeks to defend the policy.
 
He repeats the tired old canard that we want to “Use the collective weight of the EU’s members to attain our common interests”, seemingly forgetting that it is the lack of consensus among member-states that makes the EU a barrier to effective international negotiation.  Perhaps he has forgotten how French protectionism was substantially responsible for the failure to reach agreement on the Doha Round in Hong Kong in December 2005.  Or how similar EU disagreements were at least partly responsible for the failure (thank Heaven!) of the Copenhagen Climate Conference in December 2009.  Larger groups exercise more clout only if they are internally coherent.
 
But the point that really stuck in my throat was his sentence: “The Government strongly believes that Britain’s membership of the European Union is in our national interest”.
 
How can a Conservative Europe Minister be so out-of-touch, both with reality and with the views of Party members and activists?  And how long will members and activists go on working for a Party whose leadership is so out-of-touch?
 
This morning I was out canvassing for a District Council by-election.  It was a damp and drizzly November day, and as I contemplated the fact that I was campaigning for a Party that purports to believe that EU membership is in our national interest, it was (in Hermann Melville’s phrase) damp and drizzly November in my soul.
 
As Dan Hannan has famously said, “The EU is making us poorer, and less democratic, and less free”.  Estimates not from rabid sceptics, but from European Commissioners, suggest that the regulatory costs imposed by the EU exceed the trade benefits of the Single Market by as much as three times (and if we left the EU but negotiated a Free Trade Agreement, we could have most of the benefits with few of the regulatory costs).  We have seen democracy undermined by daft EU laws imposed in defiance both of common sense and of our elected government.  We have seen the views of voters in successive referenda rejected with contempt.  This is the reality.  Is this in our national interest?  I don’t think so.
 
David Lidington surely has a solution to hand.  If he believes that EU membership is in our national interest, let him call for the Treasury to publish a cost/benefit analysis of our membership.  Then let those on either side of the EU debate look line-by-line at the analysis, and see if we, or the media, can reach a consensus.
 
The Swiss government did such an analysis.  It looked at the economic implications if Switzerland were (A) to join EFTA; (B) to join the EU.  Option A left it worse off.  Option B left it very much worse off.  There’s a lesson there, and if the Party won’t listen to its members, it might at least listen to a European government that had the courage to answer the question.
 
Oh, and by the way, Switzerland exports more to the EU (on a per capita basis) than the UK does, and has a higher per-capita GDP.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to “EU Membership is in our national interest”

  1. Paul Perrin says:

    So what can you do about it?

    You have to let conservative voters know that they have been conned by Cameron and Hague.

    I am not going to suggest that you join UKIP – UKIP already have plenty of MEPs (doing whatever MEPs are supposed to do).

    Cameron will be leader for as long as conservatives are in power – you cannot change him – you must open the eyes of voters who have voted conservative in the false belief that it is a EU Sceptic party – which it clearly is not.

    Once their eyes are open – the decision on what to do about it is theirs to make.

  2. Axel says:

    The EU is a Neo-Nazi Organisation.

    See the video ….
    Nazi Ties to the European Union
    featuring the, then 93 years old, WW2 Codebreaker Harry Beckhough

    Harry Beckhough was a witness to Hitler’s rise to power. Born in Bristol 1914,
    Honors Graduate at Bristol University, he specialized in German at Freiburg
    University. He served in India, and worked as a code breaker in WW2. He
    wrote Germany’s Four Reichs & Secret Communications(code breaking in WW2)

    This video is near the bottom of the special
    Zbigniew Brzezinski & Henry Kissinger Page, at
    the Fraudulent Climate of Hokum Science website.
    Click my name to go there & chose from the
    Quick Page Menu Button. Javascript must be allowed.

  3. For some time, the Conservative Party leadership have claimed to be working in our national interest. Whilst, I can see some positive changes such as the reforms for our welfare system, education and NHS reforms – true democratic accountability remains a distant prospect. The EU continues to act against our national interest (as explained by Roger above). Gradually, more and more of what this government does achieve – is going to be reversed, undermined or contradicted by new legislative measures from the EU. Most worrying of all, perhaps, is what our country will be like in the long-term? Indeed, it is likely that the UK will be reduced to a mere economic zone or region – with limited autonomy and a populace under surveillance by the EU establishment. Patriotism will almost cease to be, except within ourselves?

  4. Peter Hulme Cross says:

    “The Government strongly believes that Britain’s membership of the European Union is in our national interest”. Hasn’t David Cameron said that, or something very similar?

    As for the Cost/Benefit analysis of our EU Membership, couldn’t agree more, but every time this has been suggested the answer from the Government has been that the benefits of our EU membership are ‘self evident’.

    Well they are not ‘self evident’ to a great many people. Makes you wonder what they are trying to hide. Or even if there are other forces at work here of which we know nothing?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s