A Pretty Normal COP Thursday

Cancun, Dec 9th. Today was pretty much my last day at the Conference — I fly home tomorrow — so I was really keen to hear the up-date from Climate Commissioner Connie Hedegaard at five o’clock. Was there any progress?

The meeting took place in the Mais room of the Expo Centre in the Moon Palace Hotel (after we’d cleared out the previous meeting, which over-ran), and the Commissioner’s first words set the tone. “There is not much to report”. Later someone said, with a degree of cynicism, “It’s been a pretty normal Thursday”, and Ms. Hedegaard added “A pretty normal COP Thursday”.

Of course they may yet pull a rabbit out of the hat. Ideally, the event should finish tomorrow, but if they see any chance of the big prize, they could drag it out to Sunday. But the best guess is that the deadlock will remain on the main issue of a legally binding agreement, while the few nuggets I’ve already written about — forestry; technology transfer; a “Cancun Fund” — may be consolation prizes.

It still seems that only the EU (and a few smaller countries) really want a deal. But on the other hand, no one wants to be blamed for failure (except perhaps the US — it has a more grown-up attitude, and seems relaxed about taking the stick).

The Chinese are regarded as having played a good PR hand. At one point they issued a surprisingly accommodating press release, waited until they’d gleaned a good crop of headlines, and then quietly let it be known that there had been an error in translation, and their tough line remained.

The Guardian has made rather a fool of itself by hyping a week-old and very minor public document, failing to understand it, and sensationally claiming that the EU wanted to sink Kyoto. OK, so I don´t trust the EU — but I trust the Guardian even less.

One bright point in the unrelenting green folly of Cancun. To my surprise, I found that one of the 215 exhibitors at the show was actually climate-sceptic. It was the US public policy organisation CFACT, who are good guys. I’ve written the odd piece for them.

And they were organising a meeting at the show. Top prize for courage, and taking the fight to the enemy. The speakers were Dr. Roy W. Spencer of the University of Huntsville, Alabama, and my old friend Lord (Christopher) Monckton, whom I had last seen on our joint visit to the University of East Anglia CRU a few weeks back.

I went to the meeting. It was a joy to find common sense in an unexpected place, and a bright note in the Cancun week. I have a great photo taken with two CFACT staffers, one dressed as the Earth Mother and the other as a polar bear — but sadly I can’t download it till I get home.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to A Pretty Normal COP Thursday

  1. David Walker says:

    Thanks for your updates. I look forward to the pictures.

  2. Thank you, Roger Helmer – for continuing to keep us informed regarding the latest climate conference fiasco. It seems as if the climate alarmists have achieved little more than making fools of themselves, whilst world leaders try to “look” as if they care about carbon emissions (so long as they have something to gain from adopting that posture).

  3. Sean O'Hare says:

    Mr Helmer,

    Lord Christopher Monckton seems to be very pessimistic about the Cancun outcome. He seems to thinks that a legally binding agreement may be on the cards for Durban next year.


    Will be very interested to get your take this when you get back.

    • Chris Huhne describes the outcome as “a great turning point in the fight against climate change”. But all it amounts to is a restatement of general aspirations, and a re-hash of un-met commitments from Copenhagen — plus of course the Cancun fund and forestry initiatives which I predicted. Yes, they are talking about “solid steps towards agreement in Durban in 2011”, but this is just to help them get over their disappointment. No doubt after Durban they’ll be talking about “solid steps towards Qatar in 2012”!

  4. Roger’s further comments confirm my own conclusions, after listening to a couple of BBC news sources very recently. There is no point in making grandiose claims about intentions or commitments, without the willpower to go ahead and implement them. Furthermore, even legally binding agreements sometimes include clauses by which the signatories can renege on their commitments! The references to Lord Monckton in this blogpost also reminded me, of the blatant force used against him at the Copenhagen conference. Those following the bigger picture surrounding that conference, may remember the occasion when Lord Monckton was physically assaulted – and other examples of aggression used by proponents of climate alarmism at this event?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s