The Euro: did Tolkien get there first?

Like my good colleague Dan Hannan, I am a great fan of The Lord of the Rings (though I can’t remember huge chunks of it verbatim in quite the way that Dan can).  But who could not awed by the power of one One Ring?

One ring to rule them all,
One ring to find them,
One ring to bring them all,
And in the darkness bind them.

It was, as Tolkien puts it, “the treasure of the Enemy, fraught with all his malice; and in it lay a great part of his strength of old”.  Sauron the Dark Lord deceived the elves, apparently sharing with them his wisdom and skill in the forging of rings, only to create in secret in the Mountain of Doom the One Ring to enslave them all.  Much that Sauron had built and made was dependent on the One Ring, and when it was finally destroyed, all of Sauron’s power, and much that he had made with it, including The Dark Tower of Barad-Dur, collapsed into dust.  It was Sauron’s loss of this ring, and its subsequent finding by Bilbo the Hobbit, that forms the basis of Tolkien’s great work.

I can never avoid recalling the One Ring when people tell me that the euro cannot fail, because “there’s too much political capital and political will bound up in it — European leaders will never allow it to fail”.  As with Sauron and the One Ring, so with the EU and the euro.  The short answer to this is to ask whether any amount of political will can sustain the unsustainable.  Economist Roger Bootle put it very graphically when he remarked “No amount of political will can enable you to hit the moon with a pea-shooter”.

As I have frequently argued, I believe we are watching the end-game for the euro.  All single currencies and fixed exchange rate mechanisms finally founder under the weight of their own internal inconsistencies (“You can’t buck the markets”), and this one will too.  There may be something called a euro in ten years’ time, but it will be a very different beast from today’s euro, and indeed from the vision of Jean Monet and Jacques Delors.

But let’s think beyond the demise of the euro to the implications for the EU as a whole.  The euro has a clear parallel with “the One Ring to rule them all”, because in attempting to sustain the single currency, European leaders are calling for central supervision of fiscal policies, European taxes, an EU debt union, and so on.  Indeed the central weakness of the euro project was the creation of the currency before the necessary political and fiscal infrastructure was in place to support it — an infrastructure, by the way, which no British eurosceptic could countenance.  But just like to One Ring, the euro was a device intended to “rule them all”.

And just as the Dark Lord invested much of his power in the One Ring, so the Eurocrats have invested much of their political capital in the euro.  The collapse of the euro will be an event which they will find it difficult to survive.  Perhaps, like the tower of Barad-Dur, we will see the glistening pinnacles of the European institutions collapse metaphorically into the dust.  Certainly the collapse of Rumpy Pumpy’s £280 million President’s palace, the so-called “EUterus”, would be a consummation devoutly to be wished.

And not just the buildings.  Already we are seeing rumours that Steve Hilton and perhaps Oliver Letwin are starting to think about a post-EU era.  It’s not just the euro heading for the buffers.  We also see EU member-states simply ignoring the Schengen rules when it suits them.  We see growing public anger over the EU budget, and the Human Rights Act, and (especially in the East Midlands) over the lost rolling-stock order for Bombardier.   I think the mood is rapidly changing.

It is about time for a major political party to get a grip on this new mood, or the public will turn to other parties.  It would be enough for the Conservative Party to offer, without conditions, a referendum on EU membership, while guaranteeing to respect the outcome.  That would have a huge impact.  But without it, I fear we may not top the poll in the 2014 euro-elections.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to The Euro: did Tolkien get there first?

  1. Andrew Shakespeare says:

    Following his reneging on his manifesto commitment to repatriate powers, followed by his giving powers away about as fast as he possibly can, followed by his throwing billions at the EU and their little darling Euro — who would take seriously any commitment to an in / out referendum by Cameron? Who would believe any guarantee he made to respect the outcome? How long do you think it would take people to ask whether such a guarantee was cast -iron — two minutes? Thirty seconds? Less?

  2. Tapestry says:

    the only way to set a referendum in stone is not to promise one but to hold one. promises will simply not be believed by any party.

  3. Peter Adams says:

    “It would be enough for the Conservative Party to offer, without conditions, a referendum on EU membership, while guaranteeing to respect the outcome” And who is going to believe them? They have made promises before and not kept them so why should anyone be gullible enough to believe it this time? Maybe if they get rid of Cameron who fudged on his previous promise, they MIGHT have a slim chance.

  4. Peter Hulme Cross says:

    Macmillan, Heath, Thatcher (signed the Single European Act), Major, Cameron…have all betrayed us over the European Union.

    Quislings like Howe, Herd, Heseltine..also betrayed us over the EU.

    Lords Patten, Brittan and other former EU officials in the Lords still betray us over the EU.

    What have they all got in common?? Why, they’re all Conservatives!!

    So, who’d trust the Conservatives on anything to do with the EU??

  5. Robert Dow says:

    A referendum would indeed be a democratic step in the right direction, but who would prevent the inevitable rigging of it to suit the europhiles?

    In the meantime, our spineless political leaders have missed a great opportunity to display the clout our positive balance of payments with the EU deserves; the ridiculous proposed increase in the EU budget should have been met with a statement of the obvious – we can’t afford it! That should be followed immediately by a declaration of a reduction in UK payments of at least 10% and preferably 20%.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s