Ill-treatment of dogs in Romania

Dogs in a pound in Bucharest

Last week I went to Bucharest, Romania, with a delegation from the European parliament’s Petitions Committee.  We were dealing with a number of issues raised in various petitions including:

Wind turbines: There are protests against proposals to install 2,400 wind turbines in a scenic area of the country;

Gold Mining: There are protests against plans to invest a billion euros in a new gold-mining project in the town of Rosia Montana, where they have a two-thousand year tradition of mining, and 80% unemployment.

Bucharest Cathedral:  The Catholic Church is very upset about a 20-storey building which has been erected within twenty feet of the historic Cathedral, using a very dodgy and illegal building permit.  We met with the Metropolitan Archbishop of Bucharest.

International adoption: Romania banned international adoptions after the revelation of abuses of some children adopted abroad.  Meantime the country has some 60,000 children in orphanages where money is tight and standards woefully low.  Is it better to allow international adoption, accepting the risks involved — or leave children to the virtual certainty of a very poor life in a local orphanage?

But I want to record an incident unrelated to any of these petitions.  We MEPs have recently been bombarded by huge numbers of spam e-mails protesting at the treatment of dogs in Romania.  There seem to be grounds for the protests.  There are reports of large numbers of strays being rounded up for slaughter, kept in appalling conditions, and disposed of with scant regard for animal welfare.  I have to say that though I yield to no one in my concern for animal welfare, and especially that of dogs, I rapidly lose sympathy with these organised spamming campaigns, especially when, like this one, they are couched in impersonal and peremptory terms.

“We the undersigned as European taxpayers demand that you … etc etc etc…”.  I noted that a high proportion of them came from the USA, and at first I replied “EU taxpayer? In Minnesota?” until the numbers became too great and I simply deleted them.  (Apologies to any East Midlands constituents that I may have overlooked, but there were just too many to analyse).

I should add that I understand that there may regrettably be a need to cull stray and feral dogs, and I can accept that provided that it is done humanely.  The evidence seems to indicate that this is not always the case in Romania.

With Secretary of State for the Environment Cristian Apostol


However I found myself in Bucharest in a meeting with the Secretary of State for the Environment Cristian Apostol, sitting in the vast marble halls of former President Ceausescu’s preposterous People’s Palace, now used inter alia as the home of the Romanian parliament.  The opportunity to raise the animal welfare issue seemed too good to miss.  It was a large meeting where many participants wanted to speak, and we had a full agenda and very limited time, so there was no opportunity for an extended debate, and indeed I was imposing on the patience of the meeting by introducing a non-agenda item at all.  But I did mention that we had all been recipients of this spam campaign, that we were concerned about animal welfare, and that I invited the Secretary of State’s comments.

I was fairly astonished by his reply (which may have lost something in translation).  He said that responsibility for the management of stray and feral dogs had been transferred from national to regional government — but offered no suggesting as to whether, or why, this might improve matters.  And he spoke about the implications of their policy for human and public health.  But he said nothing at all about animal welfare or the humane treatment of dogs.  Nothing at all.  It was as if animal welfare were a completely alien concept that he was unable to engage with.

It was not possible in that context to ask any follow-up question, but I will certainly be writing to Mr. Apostol.

So I hope that all those who have been spamming MEPs about Romanian dogs will take note that I did at least raise the issue with a Romanian Minister.  I am sure that most readers of this blog will share my concern for stray dogs.  But I wonder whether those who wrote to MEPs should perhaps be even more concerned about the plight of Romanian children in those orphanages?

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

13 Responses to Ill-treatment of dogs in Romania

  1. dave says:

    What a joke! Helmer – blood sport fanatic and serial animal abuser – complaining about animal welfare.You’re not too worried about the welfare of animals who starve to death because you’ve killed their parents for a laugh!

  2. Laughable says:

    What a silly comment. Do you eat meet.. oh yes?? So you don’t care about animals too eh?

  3. fenbeagleblog says:

    Can this small dog, draw your attention to the plight of Beagles at Harlan Laboratories Huntingdon. And proposed EU regulations allowing for the clubbing to death of Beagles?

    …It’s all closer to home, and Fen Beagle could hardly fail to mention it…

    http://fenbeagleblog.wordpress.com/2011/09/11/hey-girl-whats-going-down-down-down/

  4. Pingback: There’s gold in them thar hills! | Roger Helmer MEP

  5. Pingback: There’s gold in them thar hills! | The Freedom Association

  6. Grigore Mitrea says:

    I find it regrettable and an INSULT that after coming to Romania and in spite of 100000 signatures against the project to extract gold with cyanide at Rosia Montana all you have to say is this:

    “Gold Mining: There are protests against plans to invest a billion euros in a new gold-mining project in the town of Rosia Montana, where they have a two-thousand year tradition of mining, and 80% unemployment.”

    The protest are against the extraction of an estimate of 300 tons of gold(10.5 GBP billions), 1600 and silver with cyanide. The corporation will keep the gold, silver and other metals and the Romanians will get to keep an environmental and social disaster.
    The project means:
    -4282 hectares of land affected- the size of City of Westminster and Borough of Camden toghther.
    -400 hectare of open mining,
    – a 180 m high dam containing 250,000,000 tones!! mud, cyanide and heavy metals.
    -750 houses demolished,
    -1800 people relocated
    – churches and cemeteries destroyed
    – the destruction of 2000 year old roman and medieval mining galleries.

    It is adding insult to injury to mention the fact that the town have 80% unemployment and not mentioning that this is due to the corrupt local politicians who have closed the are to any other economical activity declaring it a mono industrial mining zone. Also the project as is stands will probably run for 17 years and for the most part will only employ maybe 500 people. On top of this the corporation has a 10 year exemption on taxes and low export custom tax. The area will be a barren desert filled with poisons after the gold leaves and the people brought in to work will have to scatter away.
    I have not said anything about the dubious legal status of the whole project.

    Please sir DO tell us what will the alleged 1 billion investment pay for? Will it pay for the complete cleaning and reconstruction of mountains, history and houses and for the amazing nature there is there now? will it pay for the sorrow of the people of the town of Rosia Montana who have been fighting for the past 10 years to be able to keep their forefathers in their cemetery?

  7. Pingback: Socialistul Victor Bostinaru ne mustra intr-un Drept la Replica. Europarlamentarul Roger Helmer despre Bostinaru si Rosia Montana | Ziarişti Online

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s