A tale of two media

Kane Gorny

Surely anyone with a scrap of compassion will be moved and shocked by the dreadful story of Kane Gorny, the 22-year-old who died of dehydration in Saint George’s Hospital in Tooting, South London.  Bad enough that anyone should die in an English hospital of entirely preventable causes.  Bad enough that standards of care were lax enough that no proper checks were made on his level of dehydration.  But it was worse than that.  Both Kane and his mother, Rita Cronin, had pointed out his condition to the staff.  They were ignored.  Incredibly, Kane himself was so worried, and so thirsty, that he even called the police to get help — but they were turned away by the medical staff.

So it is very important to understand what went wrong, and why.  And here we find a stark contrast in the reporting of the coroner’s findings by the BBC on the one hand, and the Daily Telegraph on the other.  The BBC Today Programme devoted several minutes on Friday morning to a discussion, which centred on the (very justified) criticisms of the treatment and the hospital staff.  It then went into a general discussion of nursing and nurses’ attitudes, and soon got on the familiar territory of criticising the profession as “too academic”.  There was a need to bring in nursing staff who might not be top-flight in academic terms, but who had a natural vocation for health-care and a natural compassion for patients.

The Telegraph, reporting the same Coroner’s verdict, took a very different line.  The headline read “Dehydration death was caused by EU rules”.

Now putting the reports together, it seems that the Coroner criticised both the “cascade of failures” by medical staff that allowed Kane Gorny to die of dehydration, but also the EU Working Time Directive, which had limited the availability of key staff.  Clearly both of these criticisms have substance.  Clearly the Telegraph was right to report both.  The question arises, why did the BBC in its extensive Today Programme report, not see fit to mention the EU angle?  Nor does it appear to cover this angle on its web-site: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-18814487

Of course the BBC cannot report everything, but this is an important story of great public interest.  The facts rather suggest that the zeitgeist of the BBC discourages anything that smacks of criticism of the European Union.

We have known for a long time about the damage which the EU’s Working Time Directive is doing to the NHS in general, and to doctors’ training in particular.  Taxed with this, the EU institutions would no doubt say that the solution was simply to train and hire more staff.  Unfortunately with the present parlous state of the NHS finances, hiring more staff is not an easy option.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to A tale of two media

  1. Well noticed. This story fills me, an OAP, with dread.
    I am actually pretty distressed by the general level of reporting. Is it the internet which is actually making me more knowledgeable though? I know that the BBC best a huge bung (not sure how much) from the EU.

  2. Sue says:

    I read somewhere they get two billion euro’s a year. It must be a condition of that grant that they don’t speak out against their benefactors.

  3. neilfutureboy says:

    The BBC will provably censor any fact or tell any lie in the Big Government cause.. Sometimes, as with the dissections by our police in Kosovo, the politicians support that. Sometimes some of them don’t, but the civil servants always do.

    I am convinced the BBC are the single biggest block to individual freedom and human progress in Britain.

  4. maureen gannon says:

    So when is the revolution to start ? the media to tell us the whole truth HUH what fantasy land does that come from Roger,
    I am sick and tired of the whole caboodle, I receive mail that shows the underbelly of the politburo that rules us, I do not believe that politicos govern anymore , rather they rule us, the masses have been subjucated into uneducated dependants of the state machine, Marx would be proud ,we even have allowed Europe to become multicultural to destroy any nationalistic feelings one might have , their intent next with the new green policy is to drive business from these shores thus making us dependent on the fraudsters in Brussels, and the quislings that sit in Westminster that take a break from the House untill the 3rd of September and will not have to work past 7 30 poor loves while the support worker who attended to my husband yesterday after his hip operation , had worked till one in the morning attending to an old lady until a bed could be found for her in hospital. and we expect the truth they wouldn’t know what it was if it bit their lying tongues out.
    Sorry folks just had to rant.

  5. Russellw says:

    Doesn’t the BBC World Service have different rules, probably because it is not sponsored by the EU? I have often witnessed it covers differently the same events as domestic stations.

Leave a Reply to maureen gannon Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s