And another reason why solar PV is a waste of money

bookpic

One of the advantages of a long-haul flight is the chance to sit down and read.  On a recent flight, I picked up a copy of Super Freakonomics by Levitt & Dubner, the sequel to their hugely successful Freakonomics.  Promoted under the tag-line “A rogue economist explores the hidden side of everything”, these books apply the techniques of statistics and economics to a range of human behaviours, sometimes in a very quirky way indeed.

Super Freakonomics, for example, shows why a suicide bomber should take out life insurance.  And why the EU’s decision to raise the age below which children must use a car booster seat is pointless and irrational (but what did they expect from the EU?).

There’s an excellent chapter on global warming.  Sadly the authors buy into the underlying proposition of climate alarmism — that CO2 is a greenhouse gas, and just might cause dangerous climate change.  There I (and UKIP) disagree with them.  But they also look at our current policies to “fight climate change”, and conclude, rightly, that they are both futile and wasteful.  Bang on the button, guys.  Al Gore, the EU and the IPCC are making the most expensive gesture in the whole history of gesture politics — and of the human race.

The authors make another rather less general point, which I have heard made before, but bears repeating.  The government, through the electricity utilities, has been offering eye-watering subsidies on solar PV.  Eagle-eyed readers of this blog (with long memories) will recall that I have written several times about my own domestic solar PV system, which pays me, as a subsidy, on every unit of electricity generated, many times the cost of generating the same unit of electricity in a proper power station.

Levitt and Dubner point out that solar panels are black, and black objects absorb radiation rather well.  But the panels turn only about 12% of the incident energy into heat.  What happens to the rest, ask Levitt & Dubner?  Why it heats the panel and is radiated into the atmosphere.  (To be fair, the panels are also shiny, and some of the incident sunlight is probably reflected — but the panels do get warm).  It is quite possible that rather than mitigating climate change (on the orthodox theory), solar panels are adding to it!  If you believe the IPCC theory, you’d probably do more for the planet by painting your roof white than by putting solar panels on it.

But then, no one will offer you a subsidy for painting your roof white.

 

 

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

8 Responses to And another reason why solar PV is a waste of money

  1. Bill Hooks says:

    I know you won’t read this but one must try. The argument vs. solar panels put forward in the book is utterly and throughly debunked here:

    http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2009/10/12/204787/superfreakonomics-errors-levitt-caldeira-myhrvold/?mobile=nc#

  2. In Turkey and Cyprus their PV’s have water circulating through them to provide hot water and this not only makes use of this heat but also acts as a coolent that extends the life of those panels. This technology has been around for many years. I have often wondered why this is not more widely used?

  3. Mike Stallard says:

    I don’t often laugh out loud when I read blogs. But I most certainly did at your last paragraph. Priceless!

  4. Moira Clarke says:

    Another great post. I hope UKIP end up heavily influencing energy policy over the coming years; you deserve the chance. The funny thing is that UKIP – with nuclear, coal and gas – would do more good for environment than all of the turbine/ solar supporters in liblabcon/snp/green put together. Take this:

    Nuclear France (population 65 million) = pa 395 million metric tonnes of CO2 produced.
    Coal/ Gas/ Nuclear/ +pathetic renewables sideshow UK (population 60 million) = pa 532 million metric tonnes of CO2 produced.

    You should really read this, Mr Helmer: http://www.truth-out.org/news/item/15588-power-shift-away-from-green-illusions

    Ozzie Zehner ends up saying that “we are now learning that the solar cell industry is one of the fastest growing emitters of virulent greenhouse gases such as sulfur hexafluoride, which has a global warming potential 23,000 times higher than CO2, according to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).”

    Our current energy policy is complete and utter tripe.

    • David, 14 years a kipper) says:

      The UK, certainly North England has much low cloud cover for weeks, which I mention to folks suggesting I install some, so they say they will look into my suggestion that they will not work very efficiently under thick cloud cover, not one has rung me back yet to tell me I’m wrong. I also believe that by the time they pay for themselves, they are in need of renewing.

  5. Francine says:

    Despite a good potential for solar, and is now on
    the market made of bamboo. German political parties are not blocking development of Renewable Resource Consultants energy was delivered through a lens of energy reality.

    Smokehouses are common Thu, 2 May 2013million euros in the quarter from our ongoing operations.
    The effects of climate change which will continue until the year
    3000, not to mention lots of carbon dioxide emissions.

  6. This is happening now in China and the United Arab Emirates UAEis taking shape.
    The others are for a 20 percent cut in consumption compared with
    projected levels. The business interest group announced at the grand opening of the commercial and farm space empty by the
    time we get to a net price realized. We believe that there is consumer demand — and even enthusiasm — for purchasing
    photovoltaic recycling energy.

    • David, 14 years a kipper) says:

      So tell me how efficiently they work under weeks of thick low cloud cover which we have in Northern England, yes I know they still work, but at what reduced output?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s