Search the blog
Calendar of posts
- My final speech in Strasbourg – Two-seat parliament a perfect metaphor for the hubris and futility of EU project
- The European parliament: an apology
- COP21 climate agreement: An eye-watering amount of money for virtually no return
- £100,000 mis-spent?
- EU energy labelling: confusing consumers and creating problems for industry
Jane Davies on The European parliament: an… catweazle666 on The European parliament: an… Sheila White on The European parliament: an… charles wardrop on The European parliament: an… Mike Maunder on The European parliament: an…
- 943,952 hits
- Add new tag
- Air fares
- Alan Johnson
- Al Gore
- Animal Welfare
- Broughton Astley
- Climate Change
- Credit Crunch
- David Cameron
- David Davis
- emissions trading
- Energy Security
- EU Presidency
- Freedom Zone
- Free Speech
- Global Warming
- GM Food
- gordon brown
- Lib Dems
- Liberal Democrats
- Monetary Union
- No Campaign
- Peer reviewed papers
- Philip Lardner
- Politics Show
- roger helmer
- Sarah Palin
- Stem Cell Research
- St George's Day
- The Freedom Zone
- Vice President
- windfall tax
Well video won’t open but even with it my response would be the same “So what,s new?”
Maybe, or maybe not, the real fools are us for believing him or indeed any of them. I use the term “us” in an abstract fashion. They all have similar and lobbied for agendas and they aren’t ours.
Until we have the courage to vote for a party that reflects our views nothing is going to change.
In a word yes stamps his foot makes foolish claims then pays up
Roger, say we left the EU? What then? I think that a lot of people would quite to know the answer which actually did for Mr Salmond. (What if Scotland left the UK?)
Everyone wants trade with Europe to continue uninterrupted. Nobody (11% or so) wants to be part of the EUSSR Komisars and all.
If we take the Swiss option, it will be decades before anything is sorted. Not good.
What if we joined EFTA and the EEC and then played the Article 50 card? Wouldn’t that do the trick? We would then have a deadline of 2 years to fix something permanent up – even without a referendum.
At the moment, we are just drifting and nobody likes working with angry drifters – especially Aunty Ang.
I’ll be honest. I cannot see the point of a referendum anyway, especially with the government, from Mr Cameron downwards, rooting for the status quo. I could;t agree more that he needs to grow a pair.
Has anyone in UKIP actually thought about this at all?
Very well expressed Roger. Cameron certainly is making a fool of himself. But I have doubts he is engaging reality, or ever will.
MS clearly has not heard any of William Dartmouth’s speeches about trade arrangements post EU. The nub is our membership of the World Trade Organisation guarantees our trading position after we leave the EU
The cheque is signed…just needs the big numbers added. Add fine/interest as required.
At about 1.29 mins in a man walked behind you with snowed capped shoulders? Remnants of curtains? Seagull bombing?
The House of Lords Science and Technology Committee on energy policy yesterday. Prof Dieter Helm on why its wrong….Helm starts at 11:39. The Milliband/Huhne/Davey problem we now suffer from. (Helm – Helmer?)
Odd really, an economist speaks..BBC won’t like that!