The UN’s Agenda 21

unnamed (1)

Wikipedia defines the UN’s Agenda 21 as “An action plan of the United Nations with regard to sustainable development”.  Of course we immediately recognise the phrase “sustainable development” as weasel words, a catch-all term incorporating a host of modish obsessions.  Much of the activity described as “sustainable” is clearly unsustainable – for example, the EU/UK energy policy which is doing such huge economic damage across the continent.  A better phrase for the UN’s Agenda 21 might be “An action plan with regard to climate alarmism and carbon dioxide paranoia” – though it covers a wide range of other fashionable leftist issues as well.

The odd thing is that most people have simply not heard of Agenda 21 – although local authorities across the country, and government institutions across the world, at national and local level, have signed up to it.  There’s even a cultural dimension.  Clearly then, Agenda 21 is a key part of the UN’s global governance pretensions, and it seeks to drive policies which generally speaking are pretty unpalatable to our party.

One party member, Anne-Marie Smith, has been particularly exercised over Agenda 21, and frustrated that it seems to operate under the radar, with citizens and voters largely unaware of it.  I invited her to put her thoughts into a few hundred words, and I promised to run them as a guest blog.  Here they are:

UN Agenda 21 – Anne-Marie Smith

Few political discussions are now taking place without some mention of whether Britain would be better served by removing itself from the EU. However our politicians and MSM seem strangely quiet about the real elephant in the room: UN – Agenda 21.

Perhaps the reason for this, is that its influence has now spread so widely into all government institutions throughout the World, without revealing to citizens the true nature and intentions of the agenda. Indeed it has now been adopted by many local councils in Britain as Local Agenda 21.

It was back in 1992 that the Earth Summit was held in Rio de Janeiro, and here 179 nations officially signed up to Agenda 21 — many more have followed since. Maurice Strong  has been the driving force behind the imposition of Agenda 21, and was also a member of the UN’s Commission on Global Governance. Below are several quotes by Maurice Strong that I feel make scary reading.

“Isn’t the only hope for the planet that the industrialised civilizations collapse? Isn’t it our responsibility to bring that about?” (Founder of the UN Environment Programme)

“Current lifestyles and consumption patterns of the affluent middle class — involving high meat intake, use of fossil fuels, appliances, air conditioning, and suburban housing – are not sustainable.”  (At the Rio Earth Summit)

In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that …. the threat of global warming would fit the bill ….. the real enemy then is humanity itself …..we believe humanity requires a common motivation, namely a common adversary in order to realise world government. It does not matter if this common enemy is a real one or … invented for the purpose.” (Maurice Strong at the Club of Rome)

Agenda 21 is actually a blueprint for the 21st century; which under the cover of environmentalism and scaremongering CAGW, is in fact, just communism resurrected in a new guise. It is clear to see, that with the various political parties producing their election manifestos, the Green Party is actually the “Agenda 21 Global Communist Party”.  UKIP on the other hand offers us an escape route; as it is the only party which will repeal the ludicrous, suicidal, 2008 Climate Change Act. That will definitely be a start.


This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

21 Responses to The UN’s Agenda 21

  1. ilma630 says:

    Perhaps UKIP should take out a whole-page advert in The Times etc. explaining that Agenda 21 is the overarching plan by unelected bureaucrats in uber-governments (EU, UN) to grasp global control via creeping regulation under the banner of ‘sustainable development’. It should make the clear connection that ‘sustainable development’ will be a regime imposed by dictatorship, not chosen by democracy, and interfere with and control every aspect of our lives. It should also highlight that many governments’ have present and past members in The Club of Rome who are driving this and intimately complicit with it.

  2. Actually, agenda21 worse than that… It is about a global dictatorship which is dedicated to reducing the human population to less than 1 billion. Of the remaining 1 billion, the vast majority to be herded into “mega-cities” with access to the countryside vastly restricted. Some others will be allowed to serve the international mega-elite as their servants as the elite use the wilderness as a massive game and hunting reserve.

    When hitler killed millions he was rightly labelled a monster. These environmentalists want to kill several billions and are considered defenders of the earth?!?!?!

    Some direct quotes from the leaders of global environmentalism:

    “The common enemy of humanity is man. In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill. All these dangers are caused by human intervention, and it is only through changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome. The real enemy then, is humanity itself.”
    – Club of Rome,

    “We need to get some broad based support, to capture the public’s imagination… So we have to offer up scary scenarios, make simplified, dramatic statements and make little mention of any doubts…Each of us has to decide what the right balance is between being effective and being honest.”
    – Dr. Stephen Schneider, Stanford Professor of Climatology,
    lead author of many IPCC reports

    “We’ve got to ride this global warming issue. Even if the theory of global warming is wrong, we will be doing the right thing in terms of economic and environmental policy.”
    – Timothy Wirth, President of the UN Foundation

    “The only way to get our society to truly change is to frighten people with the possibility of a catastrophe.”
    – emeritus professor Daniel Botkin

    “We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis…”
    – David Rockefeller, Club of Rome executive member

    “The emerging ‘environmentalization’ of our civilization and the need for vigorous action in the interest of the entire global community will inevitably have multiple political consequences. Perhaps the most important of them will be a gradual change in the status of the United Nations. Inevitably, it must assume some aspects of a world government.”
    – Mikhail Gorbachev, State of the World Forum

    “I envisage the prinicles of the Earth Charter to be a new form of the ten commandments. They lay the foundation for a sustainable global earth community.”
    – Mikhail Gorbachev, co-author of The Earth Charter

    “Isn’t the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse? Isn’t it our responsiblity to bring that about?”
    – Maurice Strong, founder of the UN Environment Programme

    “The only hope for the world is to make sure there is not another United States. We can’t let other countries have the same number of cars, the amount of industrialization, we have in the US. We have to stop these Third World countries right where they are.”
    – Michael Oppenheimer, Environmental Defense Fund

    “Global Sustainability requires the deliberate quest of poverty, reduced resource consumption and set levels of mortality control.”
    – Professor Maurice King

    “Complex technology of any sort is an assault on human dignity. It would be little short of disastrous for us to discover a source of clean, cheap, abundant energy, because of what we might do with it.”
    – Amory Lovins, Rocky Mountain Institute

    “The prospect of cheap fusion energy is the worst thing that could happen to the planet.”
    – Jeremy Rifkin, Greenhouse Crisis Foundation

    “Giving society cheap, abundant energy would be the equivalent of giving an idiot child a machine gun.”
    – Prof Paul Ehrlich, Stanford University

    “My three main goals would be to reduce human population to about 100 million worldwide, destroy the industrial infrastructure and see wilderness, with it’s full complement of species, returning throughout the world.”
    -Dave Foreman, co-founder of Earth First!

    “A cancer is an uncontrolled multiplication of cells; the population explosion is an uncontrolled multiplication of people. We must shift our efforts from the treatment of the symptoms to the cutting out of the cancer. The operation will demand many apparently brutal and heartless decisions.”
    – Prof Paul Ehrlich, The Population Bomb

    “I don’t claim to have any special interest in natural history, but as a boy I was made aware of the annual fluctuations in the number of game animals and the need to adjust the cull to the size of the surplus population.”
    – Prince Philip, preface of Down to Earth

    “A total population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline from present levels, would be ideal.”
    – Ted Turner, founder of CNN and major UN donor

    “… the resultant ideal sustainable population is hence more than 500 million but less than one billion.”
    – Club of Rome, Goals for Mankind

    “If I were reincarnated I would wish to be returned to earth as a killer virus to lower human population levels.”
    – Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh, patron of the World Wildlife Fund

    “I suspect that eradicating small pox was wrong. It played an important part in balancing ecosystems.”
    – John Davis, editor of Earth First! Journal

  3. Pingback: Agenda 21 | NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT

  4. ian wragg says:

    I bet Dave and Gideon together with the other 2 twits are ardent followers of agenda 21. This is just the pretext for world governance or as you say a more advanced communism.
    The Brics pay lip service to it as it means the West de-industrialises itself and they take over. The Chinese are particularly fond of it.

  5. cajwbroomhill says:

    The lefties will decry these complaints as a (bogus) conspiracy, but real conspiracies have always been a threat, not to be ignored lightly.

    If the UN is bankrolled mainly by the US, then it is time to cut off much of the funding, before that happens, would anything useful to civilisation be lost?

  6. eddie coke says:

    I imagine this was a follow-on from the 1975 Lima Declaration in which Western governments promised to deindustrialise in order for so-called “developing countries” to raise their share of global industrial production to 25% by year 2000 (see document, p.6, section 28). And of course, that’s why we don’t have any proper jobs now.

    Click to access 1975-Lima_Declaration_and_Plan_of_Action_on_Industrial_Development_and_Co-operation_26.3.1975.pdf

    It’s also worth watching the YT video “agenda 21 for dummies” ( The bit about the American “Wildlands Project” is interesting in the context of moving all American people to “smart growth zones” connected by high-speed rail (presumably so they can be herded to plantations for State-designated work). Compare to destroying southern European economies and herding people northwards for jobs – I’ve never heard of any European Wildlands Project, but perhaps that’s how you’d accomplish it: turn everybody into economic migrants and ship them to the UK? But of course, nobody’s trying to force through a highspeed rail project, are they?

    [In my cynical opinion, LimaDec and Agenda-21 are illusions. Both were about massive alleged frauds to make certain individuals a ton of money. LimaDec: to give BRICs fairer slice of the pie through gov. financial assistance? Well, no – I daresay those in charge of this treaty made some “smart” investments in China and India before all the Western money poured in – and subsequently collected a tidy profit.

    And I guess Agenda-21 is designed to rustle up a screeching army of useful idiot environmentalists – whose hearts, if not their brains, are in the right place – to help pitchfork rightful property owners off their land so the people at the top of the scam get their mitts on it (and the resources underneath) without having to pay the going rate. A gigantic financial fraud wearing the comfy jacket of altruism to hide its true nature? Yuck!]

  7. Jane Davies says:

    One of the advantages of being one of the boomer generation is I will not be around when the world is dominated by a few mad individuals.

    • Sean O'Hare says:

      I’m sorry to inform you that you have, like me, already failed to expire in time. The world is already dominated by mad individuals.

  8. omanuel says:

    Thanks, Roger, for bringing attention to UN’s Agenda 21.

    UN’s Agenda 21 was published about 30 years after the UN was established on 24 Oct 1945.

    Scientists – puzzling over falsehoods inserted in the foundations of solar and nuclear physics 30 years earlier – recognized that the UN’s Agenda 21 might have guided those decisions.

    In 1905, Einstein had shown that mass (m) is stored energy (E), released as:

    E = mc^2

    Later Niels Bohr (1913) showed that

    1. Almost the entire mass (m) of an atom is in its core, or nucleus, that is only one millionth of one billionth of the volume of the atom (10^-15), and

    2. The atomic structure, with electrons orbiting a massive nuclear core is like the solar system structure, of planets orbiting the massive Sun.

    I.e., Einstein’s equation describes the energy (E) stored as mass (m) in cores of atoms and stars.

    Falsehoods were therefore inserted in the foundations of solar and nuclear physics in 1946 to prohibit public access to Einstein’s 1905 discovery :

    E = mc^2

    After energy (E) released from the cores of U and Pu atoms destroyed Hiroshima and Nagasaki on 6 and 9 Aug 1945, frightened world leaders established the United Nations on 24 Oct 1945 to promote ‘sustainability’ by denying public access to the source of energy in cores of atoms and stars :

    E = mc^2

    • omanuel says:

      Sir Fred Hoyle and Professor Paul K. Kuroda helped us understand that global temperature data were altered to hide the solar force that produced, in solar cycle #24, the lowest number of sunspots recorded since 1750.

      Click to access Solar_Energy_For_Review.pdf

      (Sunspots appear when powerful, deep-seated magnetic fields from the Sun’s compact core emerge through the photosphere, as explained in this 2002 paper on “Super-fluidity in the solar interior: Implications for solar eruptions and climate,” Journal of Fusion Energy 21, 193-198 (2002)]: )

      There is still a mystery regarding the roles played by Sir Fred Hoyle and another well known British writer of science fiction – George Orwell – in post-WWII events.

      • omanuel says:

        These are hints to the mystery: One British writer of science fiction published papers in 1946 that changed mainstream opinions on the internal composition of the Sun from

        _ a.) Mostly iron (Fe) in 1945, to
        _ b.) Mostly hydrogen (H) in 1946

        Another British writer of science fiction started writing a futuristic novel in 1946 to warn the public a new totalitarian government would appear by “Nineteen Eighty-Four” that would rule the world by deceit.

        Sir Fred Hoyle was British writer of science fiction #1.
        George Orwell was British writer of science fiction #2.

        The unsolved mystery: How did George Orwell know in 1946 that government science was being altered to become a tool of government propaganda to rule the world by 1984?

        Tentative answer: Perhaps Sir Fred Hoyle used George Orwell to express his concerns about the manipulation of information about the Sun in 1946?

      • omanuel says:

        The futility of frightened world leaders plans to rule the world by deceit in 1945 are illustrated in this one-page “Sequel to Climategate”:

  9. martinbrumby says:

    So far as the few sane people struggling against all this are concerned, there is a serious problem.
    Mention Agenda 21 (or the Club of Rome, which takes these “sustainability” concepts further) and the average guy in the street immediately brands you as a swivel-eyed conspiracy theory loon.
    But, just as hypochondriacs can and do fall ill, some giant conspiracies are precisely that! And the ‘political elite’ who have rushed to nail their colours to the Agenda 21 mast are exactly part of that evil conspiracy.
    But, with the media either ignoring the issue or (like the BBC / Guardian) actually being an enthusiastic part of it, how to alert people to the problem?

    • Jane Davies says:

      Perhaps enrolling Jeremy Clarkson to be a spokesperson about this would alert people to the problem. After all he will soon need a new job and judging by the media hysteria he generates for being a complete idiot on TV he would be just the person to get this message out!

  10. Ex-expat Colin says:

    Mark Reckless (Tory dump to UKIP) sour grapes court case with his local Tory Association:

    Judge threw it out. My £10 seems to have paid off.

    Clarkson bad mouths most everything (LOL)…BBC mostly and is dead right. Don’t think he could stand a weak Tory but Dave reckons he is a friend? Dunno!

  11. Ian Terry says:

    Roger a great big thank you for putting this on your site. The lunatics have all but control of the asylum. The three stooges especially choose to ignore the consequences

  12. Ex-expat Colin says:

    Meanwhile outside of our la,la land(s) – Japan announces new coal-fired plants this year is seven.

    Utilities in Japan are eager to take advantage of coal’s relative cheapness to give them a competitive edge at a time when other countries are seeking to reduce their greenhouse-gas emissions by moving away from a fuel source seen as dirty.

    For those in UK probably noticed that BBC4 is punching out climate related babble (program) every night. Sure I heard a grape grower the other night saying its always too cold for grapes in Devon…not sure he was supposed to say that. Or was that balance?

  13. johnmarshall says:

    Agenda 21 is the first route to a global government. I cannot think of anything that would be worse. Kill everything so worse than an Ebola outbreak with 50% chance of a cure.

  14. Pingback: Weekly Climate and Energy News Roundup #172 | Watts Up With That?

  15. omanuel says:

    The second, one-page sequel to Climategate shows how science was sacrificed to save the world from possible nuclear annihilation:

    Click to access Sequel2.pdf

  16. Derek Alker says:

    Roger, if you want further explanation of the introduction, or the powerpoint presentation itself, contained in the below link, from me directly please feel free to ask by email. I would be quite happy to have face to face discussions as well. I know it’s a lot to take in in one go, I have been in involved in discussions and researches for many, many years now, as Oliver can confirm.
    btw – Hello Oliver, I hope you are keeping well.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s