A Call for Competitiveness

unnamed

There’s an excellent article in The Daily Telegraph of  April 7th by Chris Cummings, Chief Executive of TheCityUK , a lobby group for services.  Mr. Cummings laments the fact that the competitiveness of British industry doesn’t seem to feature too strongly in the election campaign. As UKIP’s Industry Spokesman, I’d like to respond.

Mr. Cummings writes primarily about services, and outlines the UK’s strengths – time zone, language, legal system, openness for FDI, ability to attract talent.  In a message for the next government, he also urges a stable tax environment and enduring political support for business.  But strangely, he has little to say about the constant interference by Brussels, and in particular the Bonus Cap and the proposed Financial Transaction Tax, which could have been designed to make Europe in general and The City in particular less attractive to global businesses.

But when we come to the wider question of industrial competitiveness. Mr. Cummings mentions only very briefly several factors which are vitally important: energy prices, over-regulation.  And UKIP has an important contribution to make on that key point of “the ability to attract talent”.  Yes, the UK has been successful in attracting highly-qualified professional people to London – Cummings says there are more French bankers in London than in Paris.  But we’re also allowing in very large numbers of unskilled workers who certainly put huge pressure on social cohesion and social infrastructure – schools, housing, the NHS — and may well become a burden on our welfare system.

Contrary to the caricature, UKIP does not want to “stop immigration”, or “pull up the drawbridge”, but we do want manageable numbers of skilled people, not unmanageable numbers of unskilled people (as we have at the moment, courtesy of the EU’s “Free Movement” principle).  We want an Australian-style points system.  Consider: which brings more benefit to the UK economy – a highly qualified software engineer from the Commonwealth, or two unskilled Eastern Europeans?

Then regulatory costs.  Peter Mandelson once estimated that the costs of EU regulation amounted to 4% of GDP.  But highly-respected economist Tim Congdon, in his masterly publication “How much does the EU cost Britain?” suggests 5%.   Patrick Minford in an independent assessment came up with a similar figure. But Tim Congdon also estimates the cost of misallocation of resources at over 3%, and the total cost of Britain’s EU membership around 10% of GDP.  This is a vast and unnecessary deadweight cost which radically undermines UK competitiveness.

Then let’s turn to energy costs, not included in the Congdon analysis.  Our gross over-commitment to intermittent and unreliable renewables, driven by Brussels but gold-plated here in the UK, has given Europe energy prices which are broadly speaking double those of major industrial competitors (excluding Japan).  That is simply unsustainable.  Energy-intensive businesses across the EU are closing plants and moving jobs and investment to more competitive locations.  Steel, aluminium, glass, cement, chemicals, petroleum refining.  As a consequence, jobs are lost, imports go up, and our balance of payments, already dire, deteriorates further.

And the bitter irony is that frequently these industries go to jurisdictions with lower environmental standards, arguably resulting in increased global emissions.  This is not a mere scare story from a euro-critical political stance.  DECC itself, in a report commissioned from Vivid Economics, found that imported refined petroleum products (more and more of our petrol and diesel is coming from America and Russia) implies a 35% higher level of emissions than if it had been refined in the UK.    Maybe Ed Davey would like to try to justify that.  It takes a genius to create an energy policy that undermines competitiveness, while at the same time increasing CO2 emissions.

UKIP has rational solutions in all these areas.  Secure and affordable energy based on tried and tested technologies – coal, gas, nuclear.  An immigration policy focussed on quality, not quantity.  And when we leave the EU, a bonfire of unnecessary regulations.  Of course government needs to provide the infrastructure – physical, IT, educational, fiscal – that industry and investors need.  But beyond that, we believe we need less industrial strategy, fewer “initiatives”, more emphasis on removing the barriers.  We don’t need to teach the grass to grow.  We just need to get the rocks off the lawn.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

10 Responses to A Call for Competitiveness

  1. Mika says:

    Good stuff. Totally agree.

  2. `David says:

    Ditto!

  3. Ian Terry says:

    Bang on the button Roger well done.
    Off theme maybe, but today really great news about the possible oil potential found in the Sussex area. Now lets see how really competitive the politicians get now. This with the Falklands results hopefully all the revenues will not be wasted on propping up failed policies.

    In Scotland they are banging on about lack of Salmon in the rivers. Could it be that all the low frequency infasound coupled with all the pollution from 1000s of turbine bases finally making their way to the rivers is finally having an impact on good old mother nature?

    • Jane Davies says:

      No Ian, definitely not down to the wind farms it has to be climate change to blame! At least you will never hear a politician, Roger of course excluded, who will own up making a complete horlicks of this wind energy debacle. Never admit to being wrong is their motto or they may be held accountable for all of the stupid decisions made over the past few decades.

  4. Katie says:

    Reports from Wales today highlight how many of our young are completely uneducated and unable to fill all the jobs that are going. Why do we need more unskilled labour coming in? What we need are better schools (bring back grammar schools) so that our young are able to fill these vacancies. All these low skilled workers are getting a very low wage which has to be made up by the rest of us via our taxes.

    • Flyinthesky says:

      A couple of observations here, If we returned to educating students as opposed to socially programming them our standards would improve.
      The mass immigration phenomenon, what has to be borne in mind is the benefit of it is privatised, the big companies with clout are the beneficiaries and they want it to continue.
      The actual cost of it, with in work benefits, health and housing etc is socialised. We, of little influence, bear the brunt of it.

  5. C.KAY says:

    On immigration, l`d like to ask all the”leaders” for how long the uncontrolled immigration could go on for and could they ever see an end to it or would it just continue forever?Of course they could afford to be able to keep themselves above all the social problems this would create by the fact that they are career politicians with very good incomes for the rest of their lives,especially if they suck up to the e.u.Hate the lot of them and thank you Rodger for all your great logical pieces on energy issues,they make more sense than anything that l have been led to believe,cheers.

  6. omanuel says:

    Successful competitiveness depends on superior awareness of reality.

    For the past seventy years (1945-2015) governments have used science to isolate mankind from reality.

    Steven Goddard’s hard-hitting replies to each new government lie seems to be the way to restore competitiveness to today’s deeply troubled society:

    https://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2015/04/11/experts-say-that-ocean-acidification-killed-flying-insects/

  7. omanuel says:

    How much EU funds are spent by thousands of physicists at the Large Hadron Collider each year to hide from the public the simple, beautiful and bountiful sustainer of life given in the abstract of “Teacher’s Supplement to Solar Energy”?

    https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/10640850/Supplement.pdf

  8. Ex-expat Colin says:

    OT,

    I note the sicko’s of this country have caused this to happen today:

    http://order-order.com/2015/04/13/sausage-roll-treating-kipper-turns-up-to-police-station-with-sausage-rolls/#_@/wWvBV39O1Wd5lA

    WTF has it to do with the police?

    Keep going UKIP

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s