Daily Debrief April 8th

Cameron comes clean (probably)

Most of the papers lead with the story that Prime Minister David Cameron has finally admitted that he received around £30,000 from an off-shore account. This is probably a relatively modest amount in the Cameron household, and he claims he paid UK tax on it.  But it would have looked so much better had he ‘fessed-up straight away.  As it is, his prevarication, his dithering, and especially his reported intervention in favour of the tax treatment of trusts, leave a bad impression.  Calls for his resignation are a bit premature (that comes after we win the Brexit vote), but the adverse publicity cannot have helped either Cameron, or his Remain Campaign.

The Guardian reports that Cameron inherited £300,000 from his father in 2010. It is not clear whether these funds were associated with any offshore account.

Sky News picks up the story about Cameron’s intervention on trusts, as does the Mirror.  This story looks set to run and run.  The Guardian reports Cameron’s embarrassment when he was tackled by an Exeter student over the issue.

Migrant deportations resume

The EU/Turkey migrant deal is off to a stuttering start.  There were 202 deportations on Monday.  Then they stopped.  But the BBC reports that they are expected to resume today. Not surprisingly the main problem is administrative.  How on earth do you manage to set up realistic asylum hearings in the chaotic circumstances on the Greek Islands?

It is tempting to dismiss the whole EU/Turkey migrant plan, with its zero-sum one-for-one swap mechanism, as a farce – as it may yet prove to be.  But the real objective is to create a disincentive to travel, and to undermine the people-smugglers.  It remains to be seen whether it will achieve that, or merely divert the traffic to alternative routes.

EU naval force fuelling Libya’s migrant exodus: The Times reports that the EU’s naval exercise ‘Sophia’, designed to interdict people-smuggling across the Med from North Africa to Italy, is failing, and is even counter-productive. Rather than stopping boats, they are spending most of their time rescuing drowning migrants – and taking them to Italy. In fact, doing the smugglers’ job for them.

Cameron’s £9 million pro-EU mailing

It’s worth recalling that Europe Minister David Lidington said in the Commons last September:  “Let me repeat that we have no intention of legislating to allow the Government to do things such as mailshots, paid advertising or leafleting”  (Hansard, 7 September 2015, col. 89,).  No David.  You’re doing it without legislating.  Neat move.  But is it legal?

Electoral Commission condemns Government’s pro-EU leaflet: The Times reports that the Electoral Commission has strongly criticised the Government’s plan to spend £9m on a  pro-EU leaflet – although it says it’s not illegal. The Commission is particularly concerned the leaflet would go out in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland after May 5, when the Leave campaign would be subject to strict spending limits .

Come the Referendum, we won’t know the new asylum rules

The EU is in a panic over asylum rules.  It is threatening to scrap the Dublin Convention, under which asylum seekers can be returned to their country of entry, on the plausible grounds that it is unfair to Greece and Italy.  It also wants to set up a mandatory allocation arrangement for migrants, based on member-states’ wealth and population.  Britain could opt-out of that scheme – but as a consequence would lose the Dublin Convention right to deport migrants.  Chris Grayling, Leader of the Commons, says “The EU is pursuing a plan that would stop us returning asylum seekers ….it’s a clear sign that even where we have opt-outs, we’ll still be affected by decisions taken elsewhere”.

And the worst of it is, in all probability we won’t know on June 23rd exactly what the outcome would be.  A further illustration of the point that the bigger risks attach to staying in the EU, not getting out.

The Commission has just set out its ideas but they seem to amount to no more than “change the system a little bit, or change it quite a lot”.  But either way, there’ll be pressure on all member states (except Greece & Italy) to take more migrants.  It’s reported that 152,000 migrants arrived in Greece this year up to April 4th – and 366 died making the crossing.

Germany loses patience: The Express reports that German Interior Minister Thomas de Maiziere has threatened to close the border between Italy and Austria unless Rome stops sending migrants north. (By what right does Germany close the border between two other countries?).  This could get unpleasant.  Now that there’s pressure on the Turkey/Greece route, more refugees are trying to cross the med northwards from Africa to Italy.

“An energy-sapping blow to EU cohesion”

I love the Guardian‘s take on Wednesday’s Dutch Referendum NO vote, which it describes as “an energy-sapping blow to EU cohesion.” For once, I agree with the Guardian.

German study says Frankfurt would benefit from Brexit

A Reuters study amongst financial executives in Germany concludes that Frankfurt would benefit most from Brexit, with the City of London disadvantaged.   (OK, go for Google translate).  But then that’s exactly what they said in the nineties about Britain not joining the €uro.  Fool me once, shame on you.  Fool me twice, shame on me.

Sturgeon still dreams of “an independent Scotland in the EU”

Nicola Sturgeon is peddling the old (and very fishy) dream of Alex Salmond, that if Britain votes for Brexit, but the vote in Scotland goes the other way, there could be a new Scottish independence referendum in time for Scotland to sashay seamlessly into the EU when Britain leaves after the Article 50 two-year period, presumably in 2018.

But there are obvious problems.  First, surely the Scots have the sense to see that “An independent Scotland within the EU” is an Irish Bull (pardon the mixed metaphor).  If they resent England and Westminster because parliament is remote (despite the fact that many prominent British parliamentarians are Scottish – and the fact the England sends lots of money to Scotland) then surely Brussels is even more remote, and even less accountable?  If the English find rule from Brussels’ unaccountable institutions unacceptable, if eurosceptic sentiment is spreading across the face of the EU, why are the Scots uniquely prepared to accept non-independence in the EU?

Secondly, the economic case for Scottish independence looked pretty threadbare at the last Scottish referendum.  But the terms of trade and the price of oil have moved strongly and adversely since then.  If Scottish independence was economically questionable in 2014, it looks a great deal worse now.

Thirdly, of course, Brussels and member-states are terrified of national break-ups.  If they accept an “independent” Scotland as an EU member, that sets an unwelcome precedent for Catalonia.  And the Basque country.  And the break-up of Belgium.  Sorry, Nicola, but it just ain’t gonna happen.









This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

12 Responses to Daily Debrief April 8th

  1. Ex-expat Colin says:

    “German study says Frankfurt would benefit from Brexit”

    They are already it appears as the UK £9M pamphlet printing firm is owned by a German Co. Can’t find the link just now?

    “Migrant deportations resume”. With activists hanging onto Turk anchors:


  2. Britain: Hey, eu, I need to talk with you. We need a divorce.

    EU: Not now, I’m in the middle of a crisis

    Britain: But you are always in a crisis. We’ve got to end this now

    EU: But this is an existential crisis and I don’t think I can go on without you

    Britain: You mean you can’t go on without my money. Your addiction to spending and giving away my money is one of the many reasons I want out

    EU: Our money! Don’t forget, we are still married. Anyway, I’m not going to make things easy for you. If you want divorce, expect years of negotiations and lawyers fees

    Britain: Thankfully I kept a separate bank account so a split will be easy. Talk of spending fortunes on lawyers will not impress your family who pay all your bills

    EU: But I can look after you. Think of your security!

    Britain: Security? You invite complete strangers here and you talk of security! No, I want to spend my money for myself; I want to decide who comes here and who does not. We’re finished!

  3. Anyoldiron says:

    THE PEOPLE OF THHIS COUNTRY HAVE FOUGHT TWO WORLD WARS (the last one one I remember very well indeed, for we were bombed out-living near the Manchster Ship Canal in those days). In “TODAYS” World-we pay those same foreigners, and who has got the loudest voice and is “listened ” to most?

  4. charles wardrop says:

    “Nicola’s” Party represents a minority of us Sots living now in Scotland, taking no acount of the views of the c.1 million UK Scots presently resident outwith Scotland.
    The 2014 referendum was formulated by Salmond so as to give separatists the very best chance of success, and at a time when oil prices favoured Scotland, so separatists missued their chance.
    Salmond’s successor seems to have deceived those down South that SNP speaks for the Scottish people, but that is not so.
    SNP support comes mainly from (gullible) voters in Dundee and Glasgow, many benefits-dependent, but these may soon see the light after SNP deceptions and mismanagement become more widely recognised.
    Trouble is, EU phobes here have no one in Scott.Parlament to vote for, and the usual misrepresentation of UKIP prevails, misjudged here as only slightly less-bad than our best post-war PM!

  5. MIKE MAUNDER says:

    WHAT THE STAY IN PEOPLE CAN LEARN ABOUT THEIR LEADER, DAVID CAMERON ! Details are becoming clear on the Panama Papers, and their connection with our P.M. Now if my Daddy had left me an amount of ‘Off shore Shares’ but my future was in Politics, with a wish to become leader, I would have done the same as Cameron and sold them, and would have made sure that all taxes were paid. WHAT IS INTERESTING, IS NOT THE SHARES, BUT OUR P,Ms APPROACH TO QUESTIONS ASKED ! At first a virtual denial. Then prevarication. At last an arranged interview to burst the bubble of public interest. For someone wishing to be seen as having professional ability, I would have put my Secretary, Agent and Accountant in the loop, to raise a short fact sheet, with dates and amounts. That would have ended speculation, and dealt a journalistic smack round the ear for whoever brought the matter up. BUT NOT SO WITH CAMERON. The automatic defence comes to bear first. When so many adjustments to the truth have been made about the E.U., fact and fiction get muddled up in the mind, and show themselves within totally disconnected matters. That has always been the problem with telling lies. You have to remember what you said earlier, paving the way for more lies ! Now the stay ins hold to what they have been told by their leader, but they must by now be asking questions about which items they can believe, and which have a ‘smell’ around them. I know that I’m happy with my view of the facts, that I have turned over in my mind for more than 30 years. VOTE OUT OF THE E.U., AND SAY GOODBY TO THE CIRCUS !

    • Jane Davies says:

      Just shows the lack of intelligence of the man, in a court of law once a witness is found to be a liar, no matter how small the porky, everything that person says thereafter loses all credibility. As I have said before, the fact that mummy and daddy have the means to send their precious offspring to an elite educational establishment does not mean that little David is smart in brain department.

      • Charles Wardrop says:

        Vernon Bogdanor, former Master of Brasenose College, is said to have rated Cameron highly, but he has shown a lack of common sense. A small-minded, small person.
        He should go now, after handing over to someone with brains and sense, perhaps Redwood or Davis or even Boris J., i.e.,a Conservative.

  6. Leigh says:

    Hello Roger, thank you for your always interesting and informative articles, and also for your public service for your country.

    We wonder if you’d like to write something for us, or perhaps to pick a favorite article you’ve written? We’ve started an ‘articles’ page on our site where this would go. We really would like to have all political parties represented, across the pro-Brexit side of the argument.

    http://facts4eu.org/ is an independent, non-aligned, non-profit, facts-based pro-Brexit site, aimed mainly at the undecideds in the Referendum debate. It’s particularly aimed at people who are coming late to the EU question, want quick facts from official sources, and who perhaps have shorter attention spans on this question than seasoned commenters.

    It launched a couple of weeks ago and is already buzzing with content. The news page is updated daily and often has original items not covered elsewhere:-

    We hope at the very least we’ll have your blessing and support.
    Kind regards,
    The Facts4eu.org Team

  7. Richard111 says:

    With the current migrant debacle and the democratic system of one man one vote the possibility exists that there will be a muslim government here in the UK after the next general election.

  8. Ex-expat Colin says:

    “Australia’s very own Detroit: Seismic shift ahead as industries die off”


    Steel again? And along with four of their troublesome banks…rate fiddling!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s