Daily Debrief May 5th

It’s a huge day for elections.  Scotland, Wales, Northern Ireland.  Local elections.  Several Mayors.  A couple of Westminster by-elections.  Police Commissioners.  Not a huge day for EU referendum news, but some stories are rolling on.  Meantime, remember to vote UKIP today, and vote Brexit on June 23rd – Independence Day!

Electoral fraud:  The Electoral Commission has highlighted a series of sixteen areas where it has particular concerns about electoral fraud.  A number of police forces are setting up task forces to deal with the issue.  But astonishingly, the Express reports that in one of the at-risk areas, Derby, in my own East Midlands Region, the police say that stopping electoral fraud in the Brexit referendum “is not our responsibility”.  Funny that.  I always thought that preventing crime was a key police responsibility.  But maybe I’m just old-fashioned.

Greece in the cross-hairs again

The Telegraph runs an analysis of the current state of the Greek €uro issue, and predicts a possible crisis in weeks. It seems that neither the IMF (where Lagarde is facing criticism for devoting too much IMF resource to relatively rich Europe) and the European Commission have big problems with Greece’s current recovery plan.  Greece has big repayments due in July, and may struggle to meet them.

After all that Greece has suffered, first economically and now with immigration, no one would wish them further problems.  Nonetheless a full-blown €uro crisis around mid-June would be helpful for Brexit.

Post-Brexit EU deal “could take nine years”

A report from the House of Lords EU Committee argues that a new EU/UK trade deal could take “up to nine years” to negotiate after Brexit.

The basis of this claim is that EU trade deals with other countries have taken “between four and nine years” to conclude.  Note that the headline takes the worst case.  On this basis they could just as well have said “The deal could be completed in as little as four years”.  But of course it’s not “on this basis”, for several reasons.

First, the Lisbon Treaty Article 50 allows a two year period (with a possibility of extension) during which the UK would remain a member of the EU, and trade terms would not change.  So subtract two years, and you have “two to seven years”, not four to nine.  Secondly, we start from a much easier position than arm’s length countries, because we currently share so much in common with the EU in terms of legislation and organisation.  This would enormously facilitate new arrangements.

Thirdly, while I believe we will have an advantageous new trade deal in place very quickly, the worst-case fall-back position is that we trade with the EU under WTO rules.  Other countries do this very successfully at the moment, not least the USA, China and Russia.

But fourthly (and forgive me for repeating myself, but this point cannot be made too often, nor too strongly) as the EU’s largest overseas customer, bar none, we are in a very strong negotiating position.  They need a UK trade deal even more than we need an EU trade deal.  There will be huge pressure on the Commission from continental industries to expedite a deal.  Let’s not imagine that Mercedes and BMW and Audi will allow their business plans to be thrown into doubt by years of uncertainty about access to the UK market.

In short, I believe we will conclude a deal, if not seamlessly then very advantageously, within the Lisbon Treaty’s two years.

The Lords also speak of the “horrendous problem” of untangling the legal situation of (for example) “acquired rights” of UK citizens in the EU and EU citizens in the UK.  But frankly that’s why we have civil servants and lawyers and sherpas.  If they start with mutual recognition and a degree of goodwill, these problems are not insoluble, and it is in everyone’s interests to solve them.

More on that EU Army – and an apology

I wrote yesterday about the German plans for an EU Army, based on a leaked German military policy paper that went first to the FT, and then to Macer Hall of the Express, who splashed it on yesterday’s front page.  My colleague Mike Hookem MEP is name-checked in the piece, but writing as I was at 7:30 yesterday morning, I hadn’t realised the great amount of input which Mike and his team had had to the story.  Sorry about that, Mike.  A piece in Breitbart partially sets the record straight, quoting Mike at length.

Mike has also recorded a hard-hitting two-minute video on this new threat to our independence and security.

The Breitbart article adds some new elements to the story.  Berlin and Brussels were trying to keep the plan a secret until after the UK referendum – for rather obvious reasons.  And it also mentions that many in the EU’s nomenklatura see NATO as an impediment to EU integration, and are seeking to by-pass it.  The tragedy is that with current levels of military spending in the EU, Brussels can never hope to come close to the capability of NATO.  So if we have to rely on EU armed forces, we will suffer a massive loss of capability and security.  An EU Army may feed the hubris of Jean-Claude Juncker – but it won’t intimidate the Kremlin.  With Russia encroaching in the Ukraine and threatening eastern Europe, now is the worst time to side-line NATO.

There can be no doubt that if we vote to remain, that will be seen by Brussels as a green light to go ahead with further EIU integration, and it will become impossible for us to opt out, as both Mike Hookem and Col Richard Kemp, former Commander of British forces in Afghanistan, have argued.

Mike believes, as I do, that this story will play a big part in the Brexit debate between now and the Referendum (though so far as I can tell the BBC is still maintaining radio silence).  Thank heaven it’s in the open in time.  After this, I can’t see very many serving or retired British military personnel voting to be commanded by German officers.

Heavyweight opposition to TTIP

Ambrose Evans Pritchard runs an opinion piece in the Telegraph entitled “Let the TTIP trade pact die if it threatens Parliamentary democracy”. Opposition to TTIP used to be limited to the “usual suspects” – the anti-capitalists, the anti-globalisation brigade, the anti-American faction.  It is significant that respected main-stream economic commentators like Evans-Pritchard are now questioning it.

I was struck by one paragraph where Ambrose says he believes that the EU’s regulatory philosophy is a key reason why the region has missed the big technological leaps of the last quarter century.  He adds, in a line worth quoting, “If democracies wish to ban genetically-modified crops out of scientific infantilism, that is their prerogative”.

Cameron’s U-turn on migrant children

Several papers report on Cameron’s U-turn on unaccompanied migrant children in Europe.  He now plans to admit an unspecified number.   Had he not made this concession, he could have faced defeat in the House of Commons at the hands of Tory rebels.  It is the Mail’s front page headline, “Victory for Compassion”.

Of course we all understand the plight of these children, and we should all like to help.  But the policy change raises worrying questions.  If these children are in France, or other European countries, why are those rich, civilised EU states not providing appropriate care?  The number proposed and discussed was 3000.  But this leaves many thousands more.  So why just 3000?  If they move us to compassion, what about the others?  How do we select the lucky ones – how reject the rest?  Why should a migrant child in France take priority over an orphan child in danger in Aleppo?  Then there are the worries that unaccompanied children are cynically sent ahead so that their families may join them later – and that in many cases age cannot be determined and those claiming to be children may in fact be older.

I hate to give comfort to our opponents, but in this case I believe the government’s policy of eliminating the pull factor by helping refugees in or near war-zones, not those who’ve reached Europe, makes sense.

Cynicism over Turkish accession

When Cameron was in Turkey in 2010 he said “I will remain your strongest advocate for EU membership”.  But yesterday giving evidence to a Commons Committee, he said “I don’t think Turkish accession is remotely on the cards. It won’t happen for decades”. Why did he say this?  He made that clear when he added “If your vote is influenced by Turkish EU accession, don’t think about it.  It’s not an issue in this referendum”.  Perhaps it’s just “ a dangerous fantasy” – like the EU Army?

Meantime the European Commission and Jean Claude Juncker have been dangling accelerated EU accession in front of Turkey as an incentive for a migrant deal.  The cynicism is amazing.

Cameron: “I won’t say sorry”

I reported yesterday on the call for Cameron to apologise for calling Donald Trump “divisive and stupid”.  Today, the “i” newspaper carries his response as a front-page headline: “I will never say sorry to Trump”.   While I have some sympathy with Cameron’s comments on some of Trump’s wilder statements, I think that he should take a more measured and dignified line.  Like it or not, he speaks for Britain.  He should not allow his personal petulance and prejudice to run away with him.  He could well be doing significant damage to future UK/US relations.

Cameron’s insult to Trump is a direct affront to all those millions of Americans who voted for Trump.  Not a great way to bolster the transatlantic relationship.

Probably he calculates that Trump will never become President.  But then I daresay he never thought that Trump would become the Republican candidate either.  Stranger things have happened.

Italy/Austria spat over immigration

The Express reports an astonishing attack by Italian PM Matteo Renzi on Austria, which is proposing to build a fence to stop migrants crossing the border.  Increasingly, the EU project, intended to bring peace, stability and solidarity to Europe’s diverse nations, seems to be having the opposite effect.  My advice to Renzi: refuse to allow migrants to land in your country.  Send them back to Africa.

 

 

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

13 Responses to Daily Debrief May 5th

  1. Ex-expat Colin says:

    Twitter: (about Barnet today)
    “It appears Barnet have decided to adopt the Tower Hamlets version of democracy”

    This can only get worse.

  2. Alan Wheatley says:

    Re Migrant Children, I agree with the analysis.

    I would add that far from a “Victory for Compassion” it is a victory for a placebo treatment of a guilty conscience. For it seems to me to address the needs of a minority is an excuse to ignore the plight of the majority. And in any event, it is yet another example of treating the symptom rather than correcting the cause.
    As to the Mail’s comment that the consequential funds needed by town halls will be provided by the Government, they should more accurately have said provided by the taxpayer, but they would not want to dent their self congratulatory headline, would they!

  3. Ex-expat Colin says:

    Trump Stupid……Farage Poncy?

    Cameron.. a man with an awkward bad mouth I’d say…like Trump I suppose?

  4. Shieldsman says:

    Roger,

    I think DRAFT REPORT on improving the functioning of the European Union building on the potential of the Lisbon Treaty (2014/2249(INI))
    Committee on Constitutional Affairs Rapporteurs: Mercedes Bresso, Elmar Brok

    On 20 January, European Parliament Committee on Constitutional Affairs rapporteurs Elmar Brok (EPP-CDU) and Mercedes Bresso (S&D-Partito Democratico) submitted their draft report. The final text is expected to be adopted by the Parliament before the summer break.
    German MEP Elmar Brok is chairman of the Committee on Foreign Affairs and a member of the Committee on Constitutional Affairs.

    It is very relevant to the changes that will take place and that the UK will be subject to if we stay in the EU
    Cameron’s I have reformed the EU and the ‘best of both worlds’ is hogwash. A fairy story for children and Cabinet colleague’s ( the likes of Truss, Rudd and Morgan).

  5. If you are a young warrior who has thrown away his papers and who arrives in a lorry saying you are 14 years old, who can contradict you? Social Services carry the burden. I have had the privilege of teaching five such young warriors. One was almost certainly a terrorist. All were in close contact with their homes and a lot of other people by mobile phone. All were Muslim and utterly appalled that we did not keep Friday for the Mosque.

  6. wilfredaspinall says:

    Two points
    1.
    The EU army. Experience tells me that if we ever have an EU army indecision at EU level could cost us greatly.
    2.
    There is also the growth of the European External Action Service which is opening Missions in many countries throughout the world and designating Ambassadors even though the EU is not a state. Just look at the mess the EU has got us into by encouraging the Ukraine to join the EU and NATO. Like waving a red flag at the bull on its doorstep – well in its field.

    By voting to remain we will give the green light to all of this

    Wilfred

  7. Kevan Chippindall-Higgin says:

    One cannot help but feel compassion for these kids. What a shame that their own people do not feel the same but rather are quite happy to traffic and abuse them. At least, this is what we are told is the reason that they must come over here. So, the question is simple. Are we to visit the cynical, self serving sins of adults onto innocent children? I would argue not.

    So here is the deal. We take the kids on the clear understanding that they are adopted in the UK and no effort whatsoever is made to assist the parents, who put them on the boats in the first place, in tracking them down. They are safe and properly looked after. When you consider the fuss we make if a parent leaves young kids unsupervised when they go out on the lash, what exactly is the UK’s position on parents who put their kids on a leaking, dangerously overcrowded boat with no life jacket and let it loose. The Mediterranean Sea can, if it puts its mind to it, throw up some really nasty weather and sea conditions. Given the fact these boats are semi sinking in a calm, what chance do these kids have in a storm?

    Of course, if the kids are Christian, that is a problem easily solved. The Muslims throw them overboard.

  8. Jane Davies says:

    I have said it before and I make no apology for saying it again, just because Mummy and Daddy could afford to send little David to Eton does not guarantee that little David is intelligent, and he demonstrates this lack of intelligence, it would seem, on a regular basis. On the other hand our new PM here in Canada has not given his personal opinion on Trump even though he has been asked on many occasions what he really thinks about him. He is wise enough to know that if Trump becomes President he will have to work with him in the future whether he likes him or not. Cameron it seems jumps on any bandwagon in an effort to appear ‘cool’ and one of the ‘ordinary folk’ but all it does is signal how flaky he is, he U turns on a whim if means he can garner votes but he will never be one of the ‘ordinary folks’ because we, who are the ordinary folks, see through him even though we may not have had a privileged education, or maybe because of it.

    Oh and I listened to the former Greek financial minister, can’t recall his name, doing an interview on a CBC current affairs radio program a week or so ago who, when asked about the future of the EU, said there is no future, it is crumbling and falling apart as we speak and in a few years will not exist. We can but hope!

  9. amin says:

    Admin, if not okay please remove!

    Our facebook group “selfless” is spending this month spreading awareness on prostate cancer & research with a custom t-shirt design. Purchase proceeds will go to cancer.org, as listed on the shirt and shirt design.

    http://www.teespring.com/prostate-cancer-research

    Thanks

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s