Daily Debrief May 6th

“Super Thursday”

As I write, election results are coming in from across the nation.  It’s not possible to give a comprehensive account at this time, and in any case that’s not the purpose of the Debrief which is aimed at issues related to Brexit and the referendum.  Nonetheless at 6:50 a.m. it seems that UKIP can take encouragement from a net gain of several dozen council seats, and especially from the results in Wales, where pundits are suggesting we’ll gain perhaps half a dozen seats in the Welsh Assembly.  Congratulations to Neil Hamilton who seems very likely to be elected.

Beyond that, there seems to be little change.  Few councils have changed hands.  Jeremy Corbyn’s Labour Party has lost ground, but (except in Scotland, where they have come a disastrous third) perhaps fewer losses than anticipated – and seem likely to gain the London mayoralty.  Tories have lost some seats but few councils.  The Lib-Dems have taken a few steps back from the precipice.  No doubt a full analysis will be available later in the day.

There had been concerns that voters might say “I voted UKIP in the General Election because I want to get out of the EU.  But now we have a referendum coming up, I don’t need to vote UKIP this time”.  But such fears were unfounded.  Clearly voters are starting to recognise that independent and responsible UKIP voices in local councils are positive on many issues, not just Europe.

Migrant chaos this summer?

image001

The Express reports on the fears of the Freight Transport Association that pressure from large groups of migrants around Calais seeking to cross the Channel will bring massive disruption to key cross-channel transport links through the summer.  It says the Home Office reports that 40,000 migrant stowaways were identified in the first eight months of last year (and that’s only those who were discovered).  This year may be worse.  One transport operator describes Calais as “the Wild West” for lorry drivers, who face repeated attacks with baulks of timber, bricks and scaffolding thrown at lorries.

David Cameron was reportedly eager to hold the EU referendum as early as possible to minimise the impact on public opinion of the summer migrant rush.  But it seems his worst fears may yet be realised.

EU/Turkey migrant deal at risk

The Financial Times reports that the coming change of Prime Minister in Turkey (after the present incumbent Ahmet Davutoglu clashed with President Erdogan) could call into question the EU’s already shaky migrant deal with Turkey. Davutoglu was a main advocate of the scheme.  President Erdogan is much less enthusiastic, and despite the EU’s attempts to woo Turkey with visa-free access and accelerated accession, there are already big questions over the deal.  When it breaks down, Merkel and Brussels will be deeply embarrassed – and we’ll have given huge concessions to Turkey with little in return.

In Turkey, Cameron says he’s Turkey’s biggest supporter on EU accession.  Here at home, he says it won’t happen for decades and voters should ignore it.

EU immigration fines at €250,000 a head

Jean-Claude Juncker’s plan to distribute large numbers of migrants around EU countries seems to have hit a brick wall, with huge reluctance on the part of many countries, especially in Eastern Europe.  So his latest cunning plan is simply to fine member states an eye-watering €250,000 a head (you read that right – a quarter of a million euros) for every migrant refused.   I don’t think I’ve ever heard such a wholly bizarre, out-of-touch, ivory-tower proposal from a bureaucrat.  Ever.  He really expects member-states to agree to pay these massive fines to avoid doing something that their voters are passionately opposed to?

The Remain Camp will assure us that Britain has an opt-out from this mad-cap scheme.  All very well.  But if we vote to remain, Brussels will take that as a licence to integrate even faster, and opt-outs will be progressively culled.  It’s the famous three stages of an EU project: (1) It’s just a Eurosceptic scare story – a “dangerous fantasy”; (2) Well it’s under discussion, but no decisions have been made; (3) It’s a done deal, and it’s too late to argue.

I spent many years in business.  If you want someone to do something, you offer them an incentive.  You don’t propose to fine them for not doing it.  Juncker is making himself a laughing-stock.  Like Angela Merkel, he’s rashly made unsustainable policy decisions, and dug himself into a hole, and he’s now looking for others to bail him out.  Sorry, Jean-Claude.  You broke it.  You fix it.

The FT gets confused over immigration

The front page of the FT carries a story headlined “Most EU citizens in the UK would not meet work visa rules, data show” (though for some reason the link provided by Google doesn’t seem to work – maybe the FT has spotted its error and withdrawn the piece).  They go on to argue that this is a blow to the Brexit Campaign, who now have to explain how we’d cope with the impact on employment.  They seem to be missing two points.  First, where the need exists (and only where it exists) we’d be able to take better-qualified immigrants from non-EU countries.  Secondly, they simply assume that the rules won’t change.  In fact after Brexit it will be possible for government and employers to find a consensus on the need for immigrant labour and to set rules accordingly.  We’re not trying to deny workers and skills to British employers – we’re trying to ensure we only admit those we need, and to stop the flood of the unskilled, the welfare tourists and the health tourists.

But congratulations to the FT sub-editor who wrote the headline.  At least he understands that the word “data” is plural, and takes a plural verb.

Mirror: Tory MPs probed by police over election spending

Sounds painful.  The Mirror says that two Tory MPs face police enquiries, with a further 20+ under threat, because they failed to declare the costs of the Tory Battle Bus visits and associated costs like hotel bills for activists.  The Mirror, always keen to make trouble for the Tories, suggests that this could lead to a couple of dozen by-elections – and so threaten Cameron’s slim majority.  I doubt it will come to that, but it’s certainly an embarrassment for Cameron, and it can’t help his standing in public opinion ahead of the referendum

Trump backs Brexit

I’m not sure if Trump’s backing is necessarily positive for the Brexit campaign, but the BBC reports his remarks. This is the new, more diplomatic Donald.  He takes care to say that he makes no recommendation, and that the British people must decide.  But he says that in his view, Britain would be better off out of the EU, citing the massive problems with immigration.  And remember that Trump is an inward investor into the UK.  But it’s nice to know that there’s at least one solid issue where The Donald is taking a helpful and rational view.

“Not everyone wants broadband”

Not a referendum story.  But such an monstrous piece of effrontery that I have to mention it.  The Telegraph reports that the government is abandoning its commitment to rural broadband because “not everyone in rural areas wants it”.   It’s probably true that there are some rural residents who don’t want broadband.  But there are also some urban residents who don’t want it.  And not many in either case.

The point is that in the country, as in cities, many do want it, and the government proposes to deny it to them.  How would we feel if the government said “We’re withdrawing rural postal deliveries because some rural people don’t want them”?

And there is a powerful reason while all house-owners, rural and urban, should want broadband access, whether they use it or not.  That is because (according to some reports) lack of broadband access can wipe 20% off the value of your house.  Just how far out-of-touch can the government get?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

11 Responses to Daily Debrief May 6th

  1. terry sullivan says:

    if khan wins–it is time to leave london

  2. colliemum says:

    Hi Roger – the last and final seats have now, at last, been confirmed, and UKIP Wales has won seven – yes, seven! – seats in the Welsh Assembly. Given that the ‘cautiously optimistic’ prediction from Mark Reckless on Tuesday at the last election meeting here in Wales was five, perhaps six seats, we’re all well chuffed!
    It’s worth remembering what Nigel told us at that Tuesday meeting, namely that Labour and Plaid were ‘ganging up’ on UKIP, with informal pacts about which candidate to support so as to prevent UKIP candidates from winning. But that’s an analysis for later, when we’ve all got caught up on our sleep.

  3. Shieldsman says:

    I have read ‘Why pro-Europeans should back Brexit – to save Europe from the EU’, but like every one else they are missing the target. What is the real target – Cameron – who wants us to remain in the EU that goes from one disaster to another.

    Won’t anyone pin him on the big lie he keeps repeating over and over again – ‘I have reformed the European Union’, ‘We have the best of both worlds’. How did he achieve this miracle without any treaty reform affecting the other 27 member States?

    The House of Lords took legal advice on the use of Article 50. Any barrack room lawyer will tell you that you cannot make changes to the Lisbon Treaty without a Treaty change.

    The European Parliament are fully aware of this fact. A group of German MEP’s are saying Treaty change at the present time would be difficult so let’s try and do it by using QMV.

    Cameron is taking the Public for fools in his desperation to please his masters and prevent a leave vote.

    I am rather wishing that Aaron Banks had made a legal challenge to Referendum committee. He can of course raise a legal challenge to Cameron’s ‘I have reformed the European Union’ myth.

  4. Shieldsman says:

    Read Juncker’s latest opinion of why the EU is not working.
    rime Ministers must stop listening so much to their voters and instead act as “full time Europeans”, according to Jean-Claude Juncker.

    Elected leaders are making life “difficult” because they spend too much time thinking about what they can get out of EU and kowtowing to public opinion, rather than working on “historic” projects such as the Euro, he said.

    The president of the European Commission ridiculed British leaders for acting on “national reflexes” and telling voters they had successfully defended the country’s national interest in post-summit press conferences, rather than “speaking over Europe in the proper way”.

    He said: “I remember the highly exciting period when we were preparing the Maastricht treaty, and step by step we were moving in the direction of the single currency… It was a shared sentiment of foreign ministers and Prime Ministers that we were in charge of a big piece of history. This has totally gone.”

    “We have full time Europeans when it comes to taking, and we have part-time Europeans when it comes to giving,” said Mr Juncker, a former prime minister of Luxembourg who has spent more than 30 years around the EU institutions.

    Is this a description of Cameron’s best of both worlds his Utopia. Looks more like Juncker’s EUSSR, His dictatorship, the Emperors copy of the USSR. That’s right ignore the people who voted you into power and can vote you out. That’s what Cameron is aiming to do.

    EurActiv.com: Juncker on EU anniversary: We have too many part-time Europeans
    “The idea of one EU state, one vision … was an illusion,” said Tusk, a former Polish prime minister, who is now tasked with finding consensus and cohesion amongst EU leaders.

  5. Shieldsman says:

    Has the BBC chosen to ignore this, and bury it under the election results? They probably have a ban on reporting events in Europe until after the referendum. Cameron and Osborne’s falsehoods that’s OK for them to report on.

    Donald Tusk, the hard-headed Polish president of the European Council and an ally of David Cameron ?, rebuked him, saying that EU veterans need to abandon their “completely unrealistic utopia” of a federal Europe.
    “It’s a quite common opinion in Brussels that the EU always has problems with its member states and our lives would be much more comfortable without member states,” he said.
    “I can understand why this is a dream for some Brussels colleagues, but I think it is time to redefine our dreams for the EU as a project.
    “This means that today we must admit this dream of one European state with one common interest and maybe in the future one common nation was an illusion.”

  6. Jane Davies says:

    Posted by Steven Woolfe MEP on facebook. It’s an eye opener about the democratic process within the EU, yes that’s an oxymoron as you will see.
    Luke Flanagan MEP visits the TTIP reading room and is only allowed a few minutes to glance at the TTIP file armed only with a pen and paper….all electronic devises are locked away before entering. The film is of poor quality but the sound is really all you need to show how democracy is a stranger to the EU……..
    http://www.breitbart.com/london/2016/05/05/watch-shocking-video-reveals-secretive-ttip-process-inside-european-parliament/
    Why would anyone free thinking person want to vote for more of this?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s