A simple error in logic gave tyrants temporary control over the source of energy that powers the universe. The purpose of the climate deal is redistribution of human wealth.
From a historical point of view, Einstein (1905) discovered, Aston (1922) measured and then Weizsacker (1935) and Bethe (1936) hid the source of energy in cores of heavy atoms, stars and galaxies that powers the cosmos and sustains our lives – NEUTRON REPULSION.
We will either correct the error in Weizsacker-Bethe’s definition of “nuclear binding energy” or we will continue to be slaves.
We have no other option.
I do not think I am qualified to comment on your theory sir but it does make a lot of sense.
Dung, a 19-year old student, Kazuo Kuroda, noticed the error on 13 June 1936.
The slope in the baseline across the top of Figure 2 is the error in Weizsacker-Bethe’s definition of nuclear energy that has isolated humanity from reality for the past eighty years (1936-2016):
All stars make and discard hydrogen in solar wind, flares, eruptions and cosmic rays.
Expect Outrage supplied with frequent buckets of Bile. Once the African chat chewers get in the beir kellars there won’t be any EU left to raise anything.
The female president is a bit narked I’d say…not ending on a nice note/tone/tune – whatever..tut, tut. Good stuff Mr Helmer.
I suspect the South Australian power authorities may crank their windmills back a bit and construct some better quality power pylons. More Synchronous Power Generators/Stations are helpful also. Blame C02 of course..its what did it?
I saw this somewhere, don’t know who said it but it sums up this climate scam really well…….
“Keep the masses scared particularly the non-scientifically educated masses, is this latest made-up madness to control the people and then tax them to ‘Save the Planet?”
So true Jane. Regarding Climate Change policy in the words of the army after WW1
“Biggest **** up since Mons
I think they were and are right.
The only thing that being green is all about is greenbacks millions of them
Reposting this from the last blog. This second rate actor who jets around the world telling us ignorant folk to reduce our carbon footprint by not jetting around the world on our hols has now come up with this little jem, there was me thinking the USA was the ‘land of the free’!
He’s a complete idiot. I get fed up with all these luvvies jetting around, driving big cars and living in big houses not caring what they eat or where it comes from or who is paying in some shape form or another for their lifestyles. They are unreal and should be ashamed of how they go on at others who don’t live their lives like this.
Hubris: The Troubling Science, Economics and Politics of Climate Change
Date: 30/09/16 Michael Kelly FRS FREng, Emeritus Prince Philip Professor of Technology, University of Cambridge
This book should leave any dispassionate reader deeply disturbed. It should be required reading for people in policy and politics who deal with these matters. No thought leader should be ignorant of the contents. Let us be clear at the outset: the global climate is changing, and has always been changing. The earth has warmed by 1C over the last 150 years. That is not the issue. The issue is whether the human emissions of carbon dioxide since 1850 are heralding an imminent and certain global climate catastrophe that could be averted by engineering projects.
This is the most complete book to date that takes a critical look across the whole of the recent history of climate change as science, as input to policy, and as a driver of far-reaching societal change.
My comment: As Engineers are charged with finding alternative energy sources to generate electricity, perhaps they are best qualified to asses the claim that anthropogenic CO2 is responsible for the change.
Thank you for the post about Michael Kelley.
If you have his contact information, please send it to me or ask him yourself to comment on the sloping baseline Weizsacker (1935) and Bethe (1936) used to hide the source of energy that powers the cosmos and sustains our lives
They’d loose (or have lost) their jobs if they opened up on that topic. Without vast money money resources they cannot safely challenge.
Some internet troll asked if he could frack in my back-yard. I replied “Fine — on condition that you first remove the wind turbines”. I have four within a mile of my village.
Ch 4 News yesterday pm. Seems rumbles at 0.5 Richter stops the fracking for investigation..thats a lorry driving by.
The knitting circles in Lancs were seriously boot faced about it all and the grizzly female green brought on to warn us of…climate change. Nevermind that we have to depend on foreigners supplying us with heating energy etc.
Enjoyed your piece on R4 this morning..steady stuff. Are there “altercations” within the other groups I wonder? Only mention it because very little news comes out of Brussels unless its targeted.
Agree Roger. We have 10 just been put in 1.2 miles from our property and they are on top of the 52 we have just 3k down the road from our house. there are another 8 planned for the back of our property and all over 120m high. Lovely!!! NOT. Utter madness when half the time they are turned off now in high winds and over the past 3 days they have not turned due to no wind. Scotland has been importing power from England for the past 3 days.
Thank you, Roger, for having and using your keen analytical mind and communication skills to help society regain contact with reality (sanity)!
Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:
You are commenting using your WordPress.com account.
( Log Out /
You are commenting using your Google+ account.
( Log Out /
You are commenting using your Twitter account.
( Log Out /
You are commenting using your Facebook account.
( Log Out /
Connecting to %s
Notify me of new comments via email.
Notify me of new posts via email.
Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.